These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16289687)

  • 1. Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement.
    Kalteis T; Handel M; Herold T; Perlick L; Paetzel C; Grifka J
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 May; 58(2):294-300. PubMed ID: 16289687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
    Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice?
    Craiovan B; Weber M; Worlicek M; Schneider M; Springorum HR; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Rofo; 2016 Jun; 188(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 27093395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol.
    Arora V; Hannan R; Beaver R; Fletcher T; Harvie P
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27826701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis of the best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip replacement on plain radiographs.
    Nomura T; Naito M; Nakamura Y; Ida T; Kuroda D; Kobayashi T; Sakamoto T; Seo H
    Bone Joint J; 2014 May; 96-B(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 24788492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Conventional cup navigation with 2D fluoroscopy in THA: accurate cup positioning respecting pelvic tilt].
    Pichl J; Kremer M; Hoffmann R
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Oct; 149(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 21480171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central X-ray beam correction of radiographic acetabular cup measurement after THA: an experimental study.
    Schwarz T; Weber M; Wörner M; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Craiovan B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 May; 12(5):829-837. PubMed ID: 27714567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postoperative calculation of acetabular cup position using 2-D-3-D registration.
    Penney GP; Edwards PJ; Hipwell JH; Slomczykowski M; Revie I; Hawkes DJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1342-8. PubMed ID: 17605366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of acetabular cup anteversion with the circle theorem.
    Kosiyatrakul A; Luenam S; Chotanaphuti T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S128-33. PubMed ID: 20120674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correct Assessment of Acetabular Component Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty From Plane Radiographs.
    Widmer D; Reising K; Kotter E; Helwig P
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2652-2659.e3. PubMed ID: 29615377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component.
    Stiehl JB; Heck DA; Jaramaz B; Amiot LP
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Mar; 12(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 17487661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound-based navigation and 3D CT compared in acetabular cup position.
    Hasart O; Poepplau BM; Asbach P; Perka C; Wassilew GI
    Orthopedics; 2009 Oct; 32(10 Suppl):6-10. PubMed ID: 19835299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Planning-Assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Sariali E; Boukhelifa N; Catonne Y; Pascal Moussellard H
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 26791031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion.
    Haaker RG; Tiedjen K; Ottersbach A; Rubenthaler F; Stockheim M; Stiehl JB
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 17275626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies.
    Lazennec JY; Rousseau MA; Rangel A; Gorin M; Belicourt C; Brusson A; Catonné Y
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Jun; 97(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 21570378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a CT image based software for three-dimensional measurement of acetabular cup orientation.
    Wassilew GI; Janz V; Heller M; Wenzl M; Perka C; Hasart O
    Technol Health Care; 2011; 19(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 21957510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reliability of the anterior pelvic plane for computer navigated acetabular component placement during total hip arthroplasty: prospective study with the EOS imaging system.
    Barbier O; Skalli W; Mainard L; Mainard D;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Oct; 100(6 Suppl):S287-91. PubMed ID: 25129705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of Acetabular Component Anteversion after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparison of Anteroposterior and Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs with Computed Tomography Scans.
    Goyal T; Paul S; Choudhury AK; Gupta T
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Sep; 13(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 34484625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs.
    Park YS; Shin WC; Lee SM; Kwak SH; Bae JY; Suh KT
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 13(1):66. PubMed ID: 29609639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normative 3D acetabular orientation measurements by the low-dose EOS imaging system in 102 asymptomatic subjects in standing position: Analyses by side, gender, pelvic incidence and reproducibility.
    Thelen T; Thelen P; Demezon H; Aunoble S; Le Huec JC
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 103(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 28025151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.