These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16290649)

  • 41. Determination of pore sizes and volumes of porous materials by 129Xe NMR of xenon gas dissolved in a medium.
    Telkki VV; Lounila J; Jokisaari J
    J Phys Chem B; 2005 Dec; 109(51):24343-51. PubMed ID: 16375434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry and Image Analysis of Cement-Based Materials.
    Abell AB; Willis KL; Lange DA
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1999 Mar; 211(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9929433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In-vitro and in-vivo evaluation of enteric-coated starch-based pellets prepared via extrusion/spheronisation.
    Dukić-Ott A; De Beer T; Remon JP; Baeyens W; Foreman P; Vervaet C
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2008 Sep; 70(1):302-12. PubMed ID: 18579353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Structure of hybrid colloid-polymer xerogels.
    Esquivias L; de la Rosa-Fox N; Bejarano M; Mosquera MJ
    Langmuir; 2004 Apr; 20(8):3416-23. PubMed ID: 15875876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence on permeability of the structural parameters of heterogeneous porous media.
    Le Coq L
    Environ Technol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 18613613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A statistical model for the heterogeneous structure of porous catalyst pellets.
    Rigby SP; Daut S
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2002 Jun; 98(2):87-119. PubMed ID: 12144099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Particle size and surface area distributions of pharmaceutical powders by microcomputerized mercury porosimetry.
    Carli F; Motta A
    J Pharm Sci; 1984 Feb; 73(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 6707882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of empirical, semi-empirical and physically based models of soil hydraulic functions derived for bi-modal soils.
    Kutílek M; Jendele L; Krejca M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Feb; 104(1-4):84-9. PubMed ID: 19022525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Application of percolation theory to the drainage of liquid nitrogen from mesoporous silica xerogel Gelsil 50.
    Hoinkis E; Röhl-Kuhn B
    Langmuir; 2005 Aug; 21(16):7366-72. PubMed ID: 16042467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Porosity and mechanical properties of mesoporous thin films assessed by environmental ellipsometric porosimetry.
    Boissiere C; Grosso D; Lepoutre S; Nicole L; Bruneau AB; Sanchez C
    Langmuir; 2005 Dec; 21(26):12362-71. PubMed ID: 16343015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Pore structures of ordered large cage-type mesoporous silica FDU-12s.
    Yu T; Zhang H; Yan X; Chen Z; Zou X; Oleynikov P; Zhao D
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Nov; 110(43):21467-72. PubMed ID: 17064096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of crosslinking agents on the pore structure of skin.
    Fathima NN; Dhathathreyan A; Ramasami T
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2007 May; 57(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 17324559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Measurement and Network Modeling of Liquid Permeation into Compacted Mineral Blocks.
    Schoelkopf J; Ridgway CJ; Gane PA; Matthews GP; Spielmann DC
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Jul; 227(1):119-131. PubMed ID: 10860602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Pore structure analysis of swollen dextran-methacrylate hydrogels by SEM and mercury intrusion porosimetry.
    Kim SH; Chu CC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000; 53(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 10813766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Modeling mercury porosimetry using statistical mechanics.
    Porcheron F; Monson PA; Thommes M
    Langmuir; 2004 Jul; 20(15):6482-9. PubMed ID: 15248740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Characterization of pore structure of a strong anion-exchange membrane adsorbent under different buffer and salt concentration conditions.
    Tatárová I; Fáber R; Denoyel R; Polakovic M
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Feb; 1216(6):941-7. PubMed ID: 19117574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Structural transitions in MIL-53 (Cr): view from outside and inside.
    Neimark AV; Coudert FX; Triguero C; Boutin A; Fuchs AH; Beurroies I; Denoyel R
    Langmuir; 2011 Apr; 27(8):4734-41. PubMed ID: 21417285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Magnetization evolution in network models of porous rock under conditions of drainage and imbibition.
    Chang D; Ioannidis MA
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2002 Sep; 253(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 16290842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Porosity of different dental luting cements.
    Milutinović-Nikolić AD; Medić VB; Vuković ZM
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):674-8. PubMed ID: 16860859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Unified method for the total pore volume and pore size distribution of hierarchical zeolites from argon adsorption and mercury intrusion.
    Kenvin J; Jagiello J; Mitchell S; Pérez-Ramírez J
    Langmuir; 2015 Feb; 31(4):1242-7. PubMed ID: 25603366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.