These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16293202)

  • 1. Studying group and time invariance in maximal reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments via covariance structure modelling.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):301-17. PubMed ID: 16293202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments in test-retest designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):285-99. PubMed ID: 16293201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of multiple-component measuring instruments: improved evaluation in repeated measure designs.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):119-36. PubMed ID: 17535583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of maximal reliability: a note on a covariance structure modelling approach.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):21-7. PubMed ID: 15171799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining change in maximal reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments.
    Raykov T; Hancock GR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):65-82. PubMed ID: 15969840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method for testing group differences of scale validity in multiple population studies.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):173-84. PubMed ID: 15969845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximal reliability and power in covariance structure models.
    Penev S; Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):75-87. PubMed ID: 16709280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scale validity evaluation with congeneric measures in hierarchical designs.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 21973095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Generalized reliability estimation using repeated measurements.
    Laenen A; Vangeneugden T; Geys H; Molenberghs G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):113-31. PubMed ID: 16709282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations.
    Millsap RE; Kwok OM
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):93-115. PubMed ID: 15053721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability if deleted, not 'alpha if deleted': evaluation of scale reliability following component deletion.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):201-16. PubMed ID: 17971267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alpha if item deleted: a note on loss of criterion validity in scale development if maximizing coefficient alpha.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):275-85. PubMed ID: 17535482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining group differences in reliability of multiple-component instruments.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2002 May; 55(Pt 1):145-58. PubMed ID: 12034016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining time-invariance in reliability in multi-wave, multi-indicator models: a covariance structure analysis approach accounting for indicator specificity.
    Raykov T; Tisak J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 Nov; 57(Pt 2):253-63. PubMed ID: 15511307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The true-change model with individual method effects: reliability issues.
    Vautier S; Steyer R; Boomsma A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):379-99. PubMed ID: 17535486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust step-down tests for multivariate independent group designs.
    Lix LM; Fouladi RT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):245-65. PubMed ID: 17971269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change.
    Hertzog C; Lindenberger U; Ghisletta P; Oertzen Tv
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 16953703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha.
    Rodriguez MC; Maeda Y
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):306-22. PubMed ID: 16953707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A note on using alpha and stratified alpha to estimate the reliability of a test composed of item parcels.
    Rae G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):515-25. PubMed ID: 19017437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.