These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16294299)

  • 1. A sparse marker extension tree algorithm for selecting the best set of haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Hao K; Liu S; Niu T
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 29(4):336-52. PubMed ID: 16294299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finding haplotype tagging SNPs by use of principal components analysis.
    Lin Z; Altman RB
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Nov; 75(5):850-61. PubMed ID: 15389393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. htSNPer1.0: software for haplotype block partition and htSNPs selection.
    Ding K; Zhang J; Zhou K; Shen Y; Zhang X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():38. PubMed ID: 15740612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of SNP marker density on the efficacy of haplotype tagging SNPs--a warning.
    Iles MM
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Mar; 69(Pt 2):209-15. PubMed ID: 15720301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms and association studies.
    Thompson D; Stram D; Goldgar D; Witte JS
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(1-3):48-55. PubMed ID: 14614238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal haplotype block-free selection of tagging SNPs for genome-wide association studies.
    Halldórsson BV; Bafna V; Lippert R; Schwartz R; De La Vega FM; Clark AG; Istrail S
    Genome Res; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15289481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterisation of the genomic architecture of human chromosome 17q and evaluation of different methods for haplotype block definition.
    Zeggini E; Barton A; Eyre S; Ward D; Ollier W; Worthington J; John S
    BMC Genet; 2005 Apr; 6():21. PubMed ID: 15850495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Large-scale single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and haplotype analyses, using dense SNP Maps, of 199 drug-related genes in 752 subjects: the analysis of the association between uncommon SNPs within haplotype blocks and the haplotypes constructed with haplotype-tagging SNPs.
    Kamatani N; Sekine A; Kitamoto T; Iida A; Saito S; Kogame A; Inoue E; Kawamoto M; Harigai M; Nakamura Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Aug; 75(2):190-203. PubMed ID: 15202072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal haplotype tagging.
    Sebastiani P; Lazarus R; Weiss ST; Kunkel LM; Kohane IS; Ramoni MF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Aug; 100(17):9900-5. PubMed ID: 12900503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of haplotype reconstruction from haplotype-tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Forton J; Kwiatkowski D; Rockett K; Luoni G; Kimber M; Hull J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Mar; 76(3):438-48. PubMed ID: 15660292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient selective screening of haplotype tag SNPs.
    Ke X; Cardon LR
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jan; 19(2):287-8. PubMed ID: 12538253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal selection of SNP markers for disease association studies.
    Halldórsson BV; Istrail S; De La Vega FM
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):190-202. PubMed ID: 15812176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Haplotype block structures show significant variation among populations.
    Liu N; Sawyer SL; Mukherjee N; Pakstis AJ; Kidd JR; Kidd KK; Brookes AJ; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 15389924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does haplotype diversity predict power for association mapping of disease susceptibility?
    Zhang W; Collins A; Morton NE
    Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 115(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 15221450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for genotyping errors in tagging SNP selection.
    Liu W; Yang T; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jul; 71(Pt 4):467-79. PubMed ID: 17346256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-marker tagging single nucleotide polymorphism selection using estimation of distribution algorithms.
    Santana R; Mendiburu A; Zaitlen N; Eskin E; Lozano JA
    Artif Intell Med; 2010 Nov; 50(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 20650616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discovering Genome-Wide Tag SNPs Based on the Mutual Information of the Variants.
    Elmas A; Ou Yang TH; Wang X; Anastassiou D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167994. PubMed ID: 27992465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Principal component analysis for selection of optimal SNP-sets that capture intragenic genetic variation.
    Horne BD; Camp NJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 14691953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection using genotype data and their applications to association studies.
    Zhang K; Qin ZS; Liu JS; Chen T; Waterman MS; Sun F
    Genome Res; 2004 May; 14(5):908-16. PubMed ID: 15078859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.