These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16294461)
1. Itskov v. New York Fertility Institute, Inc. New York. Kings County. Civil Court, City of New York Wests N Y Suppl; 2004; 782():584-9. PubMed ID: 16294461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Itskov v. New York Fertility Institute. New York. King County. Civil Court of the City of New York N Y Suppl Second Ser; 2004; 782():584-9. PubMed ID: 16285105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Doe v. Attorney General. Michigan. Court of Appeals Wests North West Rep; 1992 Jun; 487():484-90. PubMed ID: 12041159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. R.R. v. M.H. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester North East Rep Second Ser; 1998 Jan; 689():790-7. PubMed ID: 12041242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Culliton v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court Wests North East Rep; 2001; 756():1133-41. PubMed ID: 17225347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. J.F. v. D.B. Pennsylvania. Erie County. Court of Common Pleas Pa Dist Cty Rep; 2004; 66():1-33. PubMed ID: 17225346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Problem of Unenforceable Surrogacy Contracts: Can Unjust Enrichment Provide a Solution? Purshouse C; Bracegirdle K Med Law Rev; 2018 Nov; 26(4):557-584. PubMed ID: 29425316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The shadowlands--secrets, lies, and assisted reproduction. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1998 Sep; 339(13):935-9. PubMed ID: 9744980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. One mum too few: maternal status in host surrogate motherhood arrangements. Oultram S J Med Ethics; 2015 Jun; 41(6):470-3. PubMed ID: 25139932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. J.B. v. M.B. New Jersey. Superior Court. Appellate Division Wests Atl Report; 2000; 751():613-20. PubMed ID: 16285110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Matter of Baby M., 3 February 1988. United States. New Jersey. Supreme Court Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():61. PubMed ID: 12289633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy. Hofheimer A Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive surrogacy at the millennium: proposed model legislation regulating "non-traditional" gestational surrogacy contracts. Havins WE; Dalessio JJ McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 31(3):673-701. PubMed ID: 15709263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Jaycee B. v. Superior Court. California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 3 Rep Cases Determ Court Appeal State Calif; 1996 Feb; 42():718-32. PubMed ID: 12041102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Baby M. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1988 Feb; 537():1227-73. PubMed ID: 11648559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A plea for the enforceability of gestational surrogacy contracts. Lascarides DE Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1221-59. PubMed ID: 16086520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A surrogate mother contract to bear a child. Brophy KM J Fam Law; 1982; 20(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 16086468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]