These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1629475)

  • 21. The use of a miniature microphone in the ear canal for the verification of hearing aid performance.
    Harford ER
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(6):329-37. PubMed ID: 7439566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An in situ calibration for hearing thresholds.
    Withnell RH; Jeng PS; Waldvogel K; Morgenstein K; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1605-11. PubMed ID: 19275318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predicting hearing aid response in real ears.
    Sanborn PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3407-17. PubMed ID: 9637028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of ear-canal-reflectance measurement methods in an ear simulator.
    Nørgaard KR; Charaziak KK; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):1350. PubMed ID: 31472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inverse solution of ear-canal area function from reflectance.
    Rasetshwane DM; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3873-81. PubMed ID: 22225043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new method to estimate sound energy entering the middle ear.
    Chen S; Deng J; Bian L; Li G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():29-32. PubMed ID: 24109616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A technique for simulating the amplifier-to-eardrum transfer function of an in situ hearing aid.
    Egolf DP; Haley BT; Howell HC; Larson VD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3411037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characterizing the ear canal acoustic impedance and reflectance by pole-zero fitting.
    Robinson SR; Nguyen CT; Allen JB
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():168-82. PubMed ID: 23524141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Acoustics of Instant Ear Tips and Their Implications for Hearing-Aid Fitting.
    Cubick J; Caporali S; Lelic D; Catic J; Vikær Damsgaard A; Rose S; Ives T; Schmidt E
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1771-1782. PubMed ID: 35733244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measurements of acoustic impedance at the input to the occluded ear canal.
    Larson VD; Nelson JA; Cooper WA; Egolf DP
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 8263823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Simulating the open-loop transfer function as a means for understanding acoustic feedback in hearing aids.
    Egolf DP; Haley BT; Howell HC; Legowski S; Larson VD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):454-67. PubMed ID: 2921422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Human middle-ear model with compound eardrum and airway branching in mastoid air cells.
    Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2698-725. PubMed ID: 25994701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modeling and estimating acoustic transfer functions of external ears with or without headphones.
    Deng H; Yang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):694-707. PubMed ID: 26328687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of acoustic ear canal impedances: finite element simulation of measurement methods using a coupling tube.
    Schmidt S; Hudde H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3819-27. PubMed ID: 19507964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sound levels in a 2-cc cavity, a Zwislocki coupler, and occluded ear canals.
    Larson VD; Studebaker GA; Cox RM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 914674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.
    Souza NN; Dhar S; Neely ST; Siegel JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1768-87. PubMed ID: 25324079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids.
    Fikret-Pasa S; Revit LJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):384-400. PubMed ID: 1573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Causality-constrained measurements of aural acoustic reflectance and reflection functions.
    Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):300. PubMed ID: 32006959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children.
    Feigin JA; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 1989 Aug; 10(4):254-8. PubMed ID: 2776986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.