These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1629485)

  • 61. The effect of gas density on glottal vibration and exit jet particle velocity.
    Bielamowicz S; McGowan RS; Berke GS; Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Green DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2504-9. PubMed ID: 7714268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa.
    Titze IR; Schmidt SS; Titze MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 May; 97(5 Pt 1):3080-4. PubMed ID: 7759648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Experimental validation of a three-dimensional reduced-order continuum model of phonation.
    Farahani MH; Zhang Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):EL172. PubMed ID: 27586776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparison of Effects Produced by Physiological Versus Traditional Vocal Warm-up in Contemporary Commercial Music Singers.
    Portillo MP; Rojas S; Guzman M; Quezada C
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 28579159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Parameterization of the voice source by combining spectral decay and amplitude features of the glottal flow.
    Alku P; Vilkman E; Laukkanen AM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Oct; 41(5):990-1002. PubMed ID: 9771623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. An Oral Pressure Conversion Ratio as a Predictor of Vocal Efficiency.
    Titze IR; Maxfield L; Palaparthi A
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):398-406. PubMed ID: 26164123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. An amplitude quotient based method to analyze changes in the shape of the glottal pulse in the regulation of vocal intensity.
    Alku P; Airas M; Björkner E; Sundberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):1052-62. PubMed ID: 16938991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparing phonation threshold flow and pressure by abducting excised larynges.
    Hottinger DG; Tao C; Jiang JJ
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Sep; 117(9):1695-9. PubMed ID: 17762794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Theoretical assessment of unsteady aerodynamic effects in phonation.
    Krane MH; Wei T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1578-88. PubMed ID: 17004480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The effect of three-dimensional glottal geometry on intraglottal quasi-steady flow distributions and their relationship with phonation.
    Li S; Scherer RC; Wan M; Wang S
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2006 Feb; 49(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 16544579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effects of prolonged oral reading on time-based glottal flow waveform parameters with special reference to gender differences.
    Lauri ER; Alku P; Vilkman E; Sala E; Sihvo M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(5):234-46. PubMed ID: 9311158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voice.
    Holmberg EB; Hillman RE; Perkell JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):511-29. PubMed ID: 3170944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Experimental evaluation of inverse filtering using physical systems with known glottal flow and tract characteristics.
    Chu DT; Li K; Epps J; Smith J; Wolfe J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL358-62. PubMed ID: 23656094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Whisper and Phonation: Aerodynamic Comparisons Across Adduction and Loudness.
    Konnai R; Scherer RC; Peplinski A; Ryan K
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):773.e11-773.e20. PubMed ID: 28366247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Glottal Aerodynamic Measures in Women With Phonotraumatic and Nonphonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction.
    Espinoza VM; Zañartu M; Van Stan JH; Mehta DD; Hillman RE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 60(8):2159-2169. PubMed ID: 28785762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Modeling the effects of a posterior glottal opening on vocal fold dynamics with implications for vocal hyperfunction.
    Zañartu M; Galindo GE; Erath BD; Peterson SD; Wodicka GR; Hillman RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3262. PubMed ID: 25480072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A pressure-regulated model of normal and pathologic phonation.
    Nasri S; Namazie A; Kreiman J; Sercarz JA; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Dec; 111(6):807-15. PubMed ID: 7991263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Intraglottal pressure profiles for a symmetric and oblique glottis with a divergence angle of 10 degrees.
    Scherer RC; Shinwari D; De Witt KJ; Zhang C; Kucinschi BR; Afjeh AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1616-30. PubMed ID: 11325132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Physical mechanisms of phonation onset: a linear stability analysis of an aeroelastic continuum model of phonation.
    Zhang Z; Neubauer J; Berry DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2279-95. PubMed ID: 17902864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Effects of bandwidth on glottal airflow waveforms estimated by inverse filtering.
    Alku P; Vilkman E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):763-7. PubMed ID: 7642814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.