BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1629486)

  • 1. Vocal intensity in speakers and singers.
    Titze IR; Sundberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2936-46. PubMed ID: 1629486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phonation threshold pressure: a missing link in glottal aerodynamics.
    Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2926-35. PubMed ID: 1629485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonatory control in male singing: a study of the effects of subglottal pressure, fundamental frequency, and mode of phonation on the voice source.
    Sundberg J; Titze I; Scherer R
    J Voice; 1993 Mar; 7(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 8353616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vocal intensity characteristics in normal and elderly speakers.
    Hodge FS; Colton RH; Kelley RT
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):503-11. PubMed ID: 11792026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approximations of open quotient and speed quotient from glottal airflow and EGG waveforms: effects of measurement criteria and sound pressure level.
    Sapienza CM; Stathopoulos ET; Dromey C
    J Voice; 1998 Mar; 12(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 9619977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Glottal volume velocity waveform characteristics in subjects with and without vocal training, related to gender, sound intensity, fundamental frequency, and age.
    Sulter AM; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3360-73. PubMed ID: 8914317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic extremes of voice in the light of time domain parameters extracted from the amplitude features of glottal flow and its derivative.
    Vilkman E; Alku P; Vintturi J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):144-57. PubMed ID: 12077506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vocal intensity in falsetto phonation of a countertenor: an analysis by synthesis approach.
    Tom K; Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1667-76. PubMed ID: 11572375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of prolonged oral reading on F0, SPL, subglottal pressure and amplitude characteristics of glottal flow waveforms.
    Vilkman E; Lauri ER; Alku P; Sala E; Sihvo M
    J Voice; 1999 Jun; 13(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 10442763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glottal open quotient in singing: measurements and correlation with laryngeal mechanisms, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency.
    Henrich N; D'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1417-30. PubMed ID: 15807029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectral correlates of glottal voice source waveform characteristics.
    Gauffin J; Sundberg J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):556-65. PubMed ID: 2779199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulation of glottal closure and airflow in a three-dimensional phonation model: implications for vocal intensity control.
    Zhang Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):898-910. PubMed ID: 25698022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of post-loading rest on acoustic parameters with special reference to gender and ergonomic factors.
    Vintturi J; Alku P; Lauri ER; Sala E; Sihvo M; Vilkman E
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(6):338-50. PubMed ID: 11721140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Average loudness level, mean fundamental frequency, and subglottal pressure: comparison between female singers and nonsingers.
    Akerlund L; Gramming P
    J Voice; 1994 Sep; 8(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 7987429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects on the glottal voice source of vocal loudness variation in untrained female and male voices.
    Sundberg J; Fahlstedt E; Morell A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):879-85. PubMed ID: 15759707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective analysis of vocal warm-up with special reference to ergonomic factors.
    Vintturi J; Alku P; Lauri ER; Sala E; Sihvo M; Vilkman I
    J Voice; 2001 Mar; 15(1):36-53. PubMed ID: 12269633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phonation Demonstrates Goal Dependence Under Unique Vocal Intensity and Aerobic Workload Conditions.
    Ziegler A; VanSwearingen J; Jakicic JM; Verdolini Abbott K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 62(8):2584-2600. PubMed ID: 31291159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electroglottographic analysis of actresses and nonactresses' voices in different levels of intensity.
    Master S; Guzman M; Carlos de Miranda H; Lloyd A
    J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 23294706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the use of the derivative of electroglottographic signals for characterization of nonpathological phonation.
    Henrich N; d'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Mar; 115(3):1321-32. PubMed ID: 15058354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New Evidence That Nonlinear Source-Filter Coupling Affects Harmonic Intensity and fo Stability During Instances of Harmonics Crossing Formants.
    Maxfield L; Palaparthi A; Titze I
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 27501922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.