These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1629518)
21. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test. Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Kimber I Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Jun; 32(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 8045461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. Loveless SE; Ladics GS; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; House RV; Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Kimber I Toxicology; 1996 Apr; 108(1-2):141-52. PubMed ID: 8644112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes. Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Mar; 11(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10684384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Examination of the local lymph node assay for use in contact sensitization risk assessment. Gerberick GF; House RV; Fletcher ER; Ryan CA Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1992 Oct; 19(3):438-45. PubMed ID: 1459374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Immunophenotyping does not improve predictivity of the local lymph node assay in mice. Strauss V; Kolle SN; Honarvar N; Dammann M; Groeters S; Faulhammer F; Landsiedel R; van Ravenzwaay B J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Apr; 35(4):434-45. PubMed ID: 25186098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characterization and evaluation of a modified local lymph node assay using ATP content as a non-radio isotopic endpoint. Idehara K; Yamagishi G; Yamashita K; Ito M J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2008; 58(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18462956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: comparisons with the Buehler occluded patch test in guinea pigs. Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA J Appl Toxicol; 1990 Jun; 10(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 2380478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods. Haneke KE; Tice RR; Carson BL; Margolin BH; Stokes WS Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 11754531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of dose-responses of contact allergens using the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay. van Och FM; Vandebriel RJ; Prinsen MK; De Jong WH; Slob W; van Loveren H Toxicology; 2001 Oct; 167(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 11578800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay. Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Basketter DA; Lea L; Blaikie L; Dearman RJ; Warbrick EV; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Aug; 43(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 10945748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The identification of photoallergic potential in the local lymph node assay. Scholes EW; Basketter DA; Lovell WW; Sarll AE; Pendlington RU Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 1991 Dec; 8(6):249-54. PubMed ID: 1823150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Gene expression profiles in auricle skin as a possible additional endpoint for determination of sensitizers: A multi-endpoint evaluation of the local lymph node assay. Tsuchiyama H; Maeda A; Nakajima M; Kitsukawa M; Takahashi K; Miyoshi T; Mutsuga M; Asaoka Y; Miyamoto Y; Oshida K Toxicol Lett; 2017 Oct; 280():133-141. PubMed ID: 28826779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intracellular expression of cytokines and granzyme B in auricular lymph nodes draining skin exposed to irritants and sensitizers. Ku HO; Jeong SH; Kang HG; Pyo HM; Cho JH; Son SW; Kim HR; Lee KJ; Ryu DY Toxicology; 2008 Sep; 250(2-3):116-23. PubMed ID: 18652873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay. Maurer T; Kimber I Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative comparison of the results obtained by the multiple-dose guinea pig maximization test and the non-radioactive murine local lymph-node assay for various biocides. Yamano T; Shimizu M; Noda T Toxicology; 2005 Jul; 211(1-2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15863260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Advantage of using CBA/N strain mice in a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay. Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamasaki K; Kimber I J Appl Toxicol; 2006; 26(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 16217858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Further development of LLNA:DAE method as stand-alone skin-sensitization testing method and applied for evaluation of relative skin-sensitizing potency between chemicals. Yamashita K; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Itagaki H J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Apr; 40(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 25786520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra- and inter-laboratory evaluations. Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 10439339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interlaboratory validation of 1% pluronic l92 surfactant as a suitable, aqueous vehicle for testing pesticide formulations using the murine local lymph node assay. Boverhof DR; Wiescinski CM; Botham P; Lees D; Debruyne E; Repetto-Larsay M; Ladics G; Hoban D; Gamer A; Remmele M; Wang-Fan W; Ullmann LG; Mehta J; Billington R; Woolhiser MR Toxicol Sci; 2008 Sep; 105(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 18556666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intra-laboratory study to determine the reproducibility of LLNA:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals. Chen W; Xing C; Hou F J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2016; 82():26-30. PubMed ID: 27456929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]