These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16295233)

  • 1. Fitting hearing aids using clinical measures of loudness discomfort levels: an evidence-based review of effectiveness.
    Mueller HG; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005; 16(7):461-72. PubMed ID: 16295233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing aid maximum output and loudness discomfort: are unaided loudness measures needed?
    Mackersie CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Jun; 18(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 17849638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing aid saturation and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 1531242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fitting hearing aids using clinical prefitting speech measures: an evidence-based review.
    Killion MC; Gudmundsen GI
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005; 16(7):439-47. PubMed ID: 16295231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Duration, compression, and the aided loudness discomfort level.
    Fortune T; Scheller T
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 10981609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired.
    Hawkins DB; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Montgomery AA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3560897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitting hearing aids to adults using prescriptive methods: an evidence-based review of effectiveness.
    Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005; 16(7):448-60. PubMed ID: 16295232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fitting hearing aids to individual loudness-perception measures.
    Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 8698159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term and long-term hearing aid benefit and user satisfaction: a comparison between two fitting protocols.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA; Kordas TM; Pellegrino JT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Jun; 18(6):482-95. PubMed ID: 17849636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing aid saturation, coherence, and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 1600219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of clinical and real-life judgments of loudness discomfort.
    Filion PR; Margolis RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 May; 3(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 1581594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control of hearing-aid saturated sound pressure level by frequency-shaped output compression limiting.
    McDermott HJ; Dean MR; Dillon H
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 10207954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loudness and satisfaction ratings for hearing aid users.
    Blamey PJ; Martin LF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Apr; 20(4):272-82. PubMed ID: 19927699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preferred overall loudness. II: Listening through hearing aids in field and laboratory tests.
    Smeds K; Keidser G; Zakis J; Dillon H; Leijon A; Grant F; Convery E; Brew C
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jan; 45(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 16562560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIDCD/VA hearing aid clinical trial and follow-up: coupler and real-ear measurement.
    Peek BF; Rosenfeld MA; Bratt GW; Williams DW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):282-91. PubMed ID: 17580724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Stone MA; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loudness scaling revisited.
    Elberling C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 May; 10(5):248-60. PubMed ID: 10331617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.