These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A re-examination of ambient air ozone monitor interferences. Spicer CW; Joseph DW; Ollison WM J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Nov; 60(11):1353-64. PubMed ID: 21141429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Field evaluations of newly available "interference-free" monitors for nitrogen dioxide and ozone at near-road and conventional National Ambient Air Quality Standards compliance sites. Leston AR; Ollison WM J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Nov; 67(11):1240-1248. PubMed ID: 28633004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field testing of new-technology ambient air ozone monitors. Ollison WM; Crow W; Spicer CW J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Jul; 63(7):855-63. PubMed ID: 23926854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laboratory and field evaluation of measurement methods for one-hour exposures to O3, PM2.5, and CO. Chang LT; Suh HH; Wolfson JM; Misra K; Allen GA; Catalano PJ; Koutrakis P J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Oct; 51(10):1414-22. PubMed ID: 11686245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions. Long RW; Whitehill A; Habel A; Urbanski S; Halliday H; Colón M; Kaushik S; Landis MS Atmos Meas Tech; 2021 Mar; 14(3):1783-1800. PubMed ID: 34017362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The application of exposure-based criteria in developing alternative primary ambient ozone standards. Blanchard CL; Byrne SV; Ziman SD J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1997 Oct; 47(10):1051-60. PubMed ID: 9354144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consistency of ozone and nitrogen oxides standards at tropospherically relevant mixing ratios. Bertram TH; Cohen RC; Thorn WJ; Chu PM J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Oct; 55(10):1473-9. PubMed ID: 16295272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Mesoscale Meteorological Model (MM5)-Community Multi-Scale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) performance in hindcast and forecast of ground-level ozone. Nghiem le H; Kim Oanh NT J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Oct; 58(10):1341-50. PubMed ID: 18939781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photochemical smog modeling for assessment of potential impacts of different management strategies on air quality of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region, Thailand. Oanh NT; Zhang B J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Oct; 54(10):1321-38. PubMed ID: 15540584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling an air pollution episode in northwestern United States: identifying the effect of nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compound emission changes on air pollutants formation using direct sensitivity analysis. Tsimpidi AP; Trail M; Hu Y; Nenes A; Russell AG J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Oct; 62(10):1150-65. PubMed ID: 23155861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of microenvironmental ozone concentrations in Durham, North Carolina, using a 2B Technologies 205 Federal Equivalent Method monitor and an interference-free 2B Technologies 211 monitor. Johnson T; Capel J; Ollison W J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):360-71. PubMed ID: 24701694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distribution of ozone and other air pollutants in forests of the Carpathian Mountains in central Europe. Bytnerowicz A; Godzik B; Fraczek W; Grodzińska K; Krywult M; Badea O; Barancok P; Blum O; Cerny M; Godzik S; Mankovska B; Manning W; Moravcik P; Musselman R; Oszlanyi J; Postelnicu D; Szdźuj J; Varsavova M; Zota M Environ Pollut; 2002; 116(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 11808553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the 1-hr and 8-hr National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone using Models-3. Bell M; Ellis H J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Dec; 53(12):1531-40. PubMed ID: 14700139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ozone exposure among Mexico City outdoor workers. O'Neill MS; Ramirez-Aguilar M; Meneses-Gonzalez F; Hernández-Avila M; Geyh AS; Sienra-Monge JJ; Romieu I J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Mar; 53(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 12661692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of liquefied petroleum gas on ozone formation in Guadalajara and Mexico City. Jaimes-López JL; Sandoval-Fernández J; González-Ortíz E; Vázquez-García M; González-Macías U; Zambrano-García A J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Jun; 55(6):841-6. PubMed ID: 16022422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photochemical modeling in California with two chemical mechanisms: model intercomparison and response to emission reductions. Cai C; Kelly JT; Avise JC; Kaduwela AP; Stockwell WR J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 May; 61(5):559-72. PubMed ID: 21608496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Passive ozone network of Dallas: a modeling opportunity with community involvement. 1. Varns JL; Mulik JD; Sather ME; Glen G; Smith L; Stallings C Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Mar; 35(5):845-55. PubMed ID: 11351526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ultraviolet absorbance, chemiluminescence, and DOAS instruments for ambient ozone monitoring. Williams EJ; Fehsenfeld FC; Jobson BT; Kuster WC; Goldan PD; Stutz J; McClenny WA Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Sep; 40(18):5755-62. PubMed ID: 17007137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]