These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16295272)

  • 21. Trends in concentration of ground-level ozone and meteorological conditions during high ozone episodes in the Kao-Ping Airshed, Taiwan.
    Chen KS; Ho YT; Lai CH; Tsai YA; Chen SJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Jan; 54(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 14871011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differences between weekday and weekend air pollutant levels in southern California.
    Blanchard CL; Tanenbaum SJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jul; 53(7):816-28. PubMed ID: 12880070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Application of ground-based Lidar for studies of the dynamics of ozone in a mountainous basin.
    Schröter M; Obermeier A; Brüggemann D; Klemm O
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2002; 9(6):381-4. PubMed ID: 12515345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An absolute calibration for gas-phase hydroxyl measurements.
    Hard TM; George LA; O'Brien RJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Apr; 36(8):1783-90. PubMed ID: 11993877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Study of the "weekend effect" of O3, NOx and other pollutants in summer of Beijing].
    Shi YZ; Xu YF; Wang GC; Shi LQ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2009 Oct; 30(10):2832-8. PubMed ID: 19968094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement of atmospheric ozone by cavity ring-down spectroscopy.
    Washenfelder RA; Wagner NL; Dube WP; Brown SS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):2938-44. PubMed ID: 21366216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beryllium-7 measurements in the Houston and Phoenix urban areas: an estimation of upper atmospheric ozone contributions.
    Gaffney JS; Marley NA; Cunningham MM; Kotamarthi VR
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Aug; 55(8):1228-35. PubMed ID: 16187592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Day-of-Week behavior of atmospheric ozone in three U.S. cities.
    Pun BK; Seigneur C; White W
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jul; 53(7):789-801. PubMed ID: 12880068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Air quality modeling of interpollutant trading for ozone precursors in an urban area.
    Wang L; Allen DT; McDonald-Buller EC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Oct; 55(10):1543-57. PubMed ID: 16295279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporal characterization and regional contribution to O3 and NOx at an urban and a suburban site in Nanjing, China.
    Xie M; Zhu K; Wang T; Chen P; Han Y; Li S; Zhuang B; Shu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 May; 551-552():533-45. PubMed ID: 26896582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nitrogen oxides and ozone in Portugal: trends and ozone estimation in an urban and a rural site.
    Fernández-Guisuraga JM; Castro A; Alves C; Calvo A; Alonso-Blanco E; Blanco-Alegre C; Rocha A; Fraile R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Sep; 23(17):17171-82. PubMed ID: 27215985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Field testing of new-technology ambient air ozone monitors.
    Ollison WM; Crow W; Spicer CW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Jul; 63(7):855-63. PubMed ID: 23926854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surface ozone scenario and air quality in the north-central part of India.
    Saini R; Taneja A; Singh P
    J Environ Sci (China); 2017 Sep; 59():72-79. PubMed ID: 28888242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of spatiotemporal prediction models of daily exposure of individuals to ambient nitrogen dioxide and ozone in Montreal, Canada.
    Buteau S; Hatzopoulou M; Crouse DL; Smargiassi A; Burnett RT; Logan T; Cavellin LD; Goldberg MS
    Environ Res; 2017 Jul; 156():201-230. PubMed ID: 28359040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface O
    Wang Y; Guo H; Zou S; Lyu X; Ling Z; Cheng H; Zeren Y
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Mar; 234():155-166. PubMed ID: 29175477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rural southeast Texas air quality measurements during the 2006 Texas Air Quality Study.
    Schade GW; Khan S; Park C; Boedeker I
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Oct; 61(10):1070-81. PubMed ID: 22070040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Weekday/Weekend differences in ambient air pollutant concentrations in atlanta and the southeastern United States.
    Blanchard CL; Tanenbaum S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Mar; 56(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 16573190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Smoke in the City: How Often and Where Does Smoke Impact Summertime Ozone in the United States?
    Brey SJ; Fischer EV
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1288-94. PubMed ID: 26720416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Photochemical modeling in California with two chemical mechanisms: model intercomparison and response to emission reductions.
    Cai C; Kelly JT; Avise JC; Kaduwela AP; Stockwell WR
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 May; 61(5):559-72. PubMed ID: 21608496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Atmospheric chlorine chemistry in southeast Texas: impacts on ozone formation and control.
    Chang S; Allen DT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):251-62. PubMed ID: 16433359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.