These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1629641)
1. Angiographic assessment of dimensions of 6F and 7F Mallinckrodt Softouch coronary contrast catheters from digital and cine arteriograms. Koning G; van der Zwet PM; von Land CD; Reiber JH Int J Card Imaging; 1992; 8(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 1629641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advantages and limitations of two software calipers in quantitative coronary arteriography. Koning G; Reiber JH; von Land CD; Loois G; van Meurs B Int J Card Imaging; 1991; 7(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 1753156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of catheter sizes and intracoronary glyceryl trinitrate on the TIMI frame count when digital angiograms are acquired at lower frame rates during elective angiography and PCI. Vijayalakshmi K; Kunadian B; Whittaker VJ; Wright RA; Hall JA; Somasundram U; Stewart MJ; Sutton A; Davies A; de Belder MA Acute Card Care; 2007; 9(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 17851976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Catheter sizes for quantitative coronary arteriography. Reiber JH; Jukema W; van Boven A; van Houdt RM; Lie KI; Bruschke AV Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Oct; 33(2):153-5; discussion 156. PubMed ID: 7834729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of dimensions and image quality of coronary contrast catheters from cineangiograms. Reiber JH; Kooijman CJ; den Boer A; Serruys PW Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(5):521-31. PubMed ID: 2933154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative coronary arteriography using 6 and 8 French catheters with cine angiographic acquisition. Ellis SG; Pinto IM; McGillem MJ; DeBoe SF; LeFree MT; Mancini GB Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Jan; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 1995176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: an in vitro and in vivo study. Koning G; Hekking E; Kemppainen JS; Richardson GA; Rothman MT; Reiber JH Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 11246248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a new UNIX-based quantitative coronary angiographic system for the measurement of coronary artery lesions. Bell MR; Britson PJ; Chu A; Holmes DR; Bresnahan JF; Schwartz RS Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Jan; 40(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 8993818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary angioplasty through a new 6 French guiding catheter. Resar JR; Prewitt KC; Wolff MR; Brinker JA Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Jul; 32(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 7954778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postmortem validation of the automated coronary analysis (ACA) software package. van der Geest RJ; Morris KG; Cusma JT; Reiber JH Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Jun; 10(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 7963757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital geometric measurements in comparison to cinefilm analysis of coronary artery dimensions. Haase J; Nugteren SK; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Slager CJ; Di Mario C; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Apr; 28(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 8462076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm-based geometric coronary measurement software. Haase J; van der Linden MM; Di Mario C; van der Giessen WJ; Foley DP; Serruys PW Am Heart J; 1993 Aug; 126(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 8338000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries. Haase J; Di Mario C; Slager CJ; van der Giessen WJ; den Boer A; de Feyter PJ; Reiber JH; Verdouw PD; Serruys PW Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep; 27(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 1525805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calibration with currently available low-radiopacity catheters for scaling in digital quantitative coronary angiography. Tadehara F; Imazu M; Kono S; Sano K Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):705-12. PubMed ID: 11753141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of new 4 French catheters by comparison to 6 French coronary artery images. Saito T; Date H; Taniguchi I; Hokimoto S; Yamamoto N; Nakamura S; Ishibashi F; Noda K; Oshima S J Invasive Cardiol; 1999 Jan; 11(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10745431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variability in estimation of coronary dimensions from 6F and 8F catheters. Legrand V; Raskinet B; Martinez C; Kulbertus H Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):39-45; discussion 46. PubMed ID: 8770477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of catheter size on reliability of quantitative coronary angiographic measurements (comparison of 4Fr and 6Fr catheters). Ito S; Kinoshita K; Endo A; Nakamura M; Muramatsu T Heart Vessels; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1752-1757. PubMed ID: 26849831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of catheters and metallic catheter markers as calibration standard for measurement of coronary dimension. Leung WH; Demopulos PA; Alderman EL; Sanders W; Stadius ML Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Nov; 21(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 2225049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of image enhancement and reconstruction on quantitative coronary arteriography. van der Zwet PM; Reiber JH Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):211-21. PubMed ID: 8596059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]