These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design. Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Partial coverage restoration systems on molars--comparison of failure load after exposure to a mastication simulator. Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 33(9):698-705. PubMed ID: 16922744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials. Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars. Bitter K; Meyer-Lueckel H; Fotiadis N; Blunck U; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM; Paris S Int Endod J; 2010 Jun; 43(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 20536574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Bremer BD; Geurtsen W Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations. Guess PC; Schultheis S; Wolkewitz M; Zhang Y; Strub JR J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 24079561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques. Santos MJ; Bezerra RB J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations: An in vitro investigation. Stappert CF; Att W; Gerds T; Strub JR J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Apr; 137(4):514-22. PubMed ID: 16637481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of gingival ceramic veneer thickness on the fracture strength of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. Gabbert O; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Farhan D; Becker F; Rammelsberg P Am J Dent; 2010 Jun; 23(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 20718211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols. Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations. de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps. Stappert CF; Abe P; Kurths V; Gerds T; Strub JR J Adhes Dent; 2008 Feb; 10(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 18389735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]