These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16296439)

  • 1. Clinical effectiveness of two agents on the treatment of tooth cervical hypersensitivity.
    Kakaboura A; Rahiotis C; Thomaidis S; Doukoudakis S
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 16296439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentin desensitizing effects of Gluma Alternate, Health-Dent Desensitizer and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose.
    Dondi dall'Orologio G; Lorenzi R; Anselmi M; Opisso V
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 10649929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of the role of glutardialdehyde in a one-bottle adhesive.
    Dondi dall'Orologio G; Lone A; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 12537345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The long-term effectiveness of five current desensitizing products on cervical dentine sensitivity.
    Duran I; Sengun A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 15089941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Oct; 12(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 10649916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effectiveness of Systemp.desensitizer in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity.
    Stewardson DA; Crisp RJ; McHugh S; Lendenmann U; Burke FJ
    Prim Dent Care; 2004 Jul; 11(3):71-6. PubMed ID: 15242562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative in vivo study on the desensitizing efficacy of dentin desensitizers and one-bottle self-etching adhesives.
    Yu X; Liang B; Jin X; Fu B; Hannig M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 20533627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of dentin desensitizers and dentin bonding agents on dentin permeability.
    Jain P; Reinhardt JW; Krell KV
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 11763898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the efficacy of potassium nitrate and Gluma desensitizer in the reduction of hypersensitivity in teeth with full-crown preparations.
    Jalalian E; Meraji N; Mirzaei M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19142258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Gluma bonding system: a clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin.
    Davidson DF; Suzuki M
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Jan; 63(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 9009533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between effectiveness of a low-viscosity glass ionomer and a resin-based glutaraldehyde containing primer in treating dentine hypersensitivity--a 25.2-month evaluation.
    Polderman RN; Frencken JE
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 16973252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of Clinpro XT varnish and Gluma dentin desensitizer on dentin hypersensitivity.
    Ding YJ; Yao H; Wang GH; Song H
    Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 25000665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity with resin adhesives: 4-week evaluation.
    Prati C; Cervellati F; Sanasi V; Montebugnoli L
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 11949798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical comparison of three different agents in a short-term treatment period.
    Ozen T; Orhan K; Avsever H; Tunca YM; Ulker AE; Akyol M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 19678443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of desensitizing agents on human dentin permeability.
    Camps J; Pizant S; Dejou J; Franquin JC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Dec; 11(6):286-90. PubMed ID: 10477980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of three different agents for in-office treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity: a controlled clinical study.
    Patil SA; Naik BD; Suma R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 25961613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term clinical evaluation of four desensitizing agents.
    Olusile AO; Bamise CT; Oginni AO; Dosumu OO
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jan; 9(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 18176645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 2% sodium fluoride-iontophoresis compared to a commercially available desensitizing agent.
    Singal P; Gupta R; Pandit N
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 15857067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of Prime & Bond 2.1 for treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity.
    Swift EJ; May KN; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11806472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Amalgambond on cervical sensitivity.
    Calamia JR; Styner DL; Rattet AH
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):283-4. PubMed ID: 8695002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.