408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16297228)
1. Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States.
Lang JT; Hallman WK
Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1241-52. PubMed ID: 16297228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: the case of GM food.
Allum N
Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):935-46. PubMed ID: 17958502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. GM foods and the misperception of risk perception.
Gaskell G; Allum N; Wagner W; Kronberger N; Torgersen H; Hampel J; Bardes J
Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 15028010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of similarity cues in the development of trust in sources of information about GM food.
Meijnders A; Midden C; Olofsson A; Ohman S; Matthes J; Bondarenko O; Gutteling J; Rusanen M
Risk Anal; 2009 Aug; 29(8):1116-28. PubMed ID: 19473312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support.
Marques MD; Critchley CR; Walshe J
Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jul; 24(5):601-18. PubMed ID: 25063421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Need for an "integrated safety assessment" of GMOs, linking food safety and environmental considerations.
Haslberger AG
J Agric Food Chem; 2006 May; 54(9):3173-80. PubMed ID: 16637668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
Lusk JL; Rozan A
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Societal aspects of genetically modified foods.
Frewer L; Lassen J; Kettlitz B; Scholderer J; Beekman V; Berdal KG
Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1181-93. PubMed ID: 15123386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public health issues related with the consumption of food obtained from genetically modified organisms.
Paparini A; Romano-Spica V
Biotechnol Annu Rev; 2004; 10():85-122. PubMed ID: 15504704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attitudes, perceptions, and trust. Insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda.
Kikulwe EM; Wesseler J; Falck-Zepeda J
Appetite; 2011 Oct; 57(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 21704665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs.
Poortinga W; Pidgeon NF
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 15660605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Food biotechnology's challenge to cultural integrity and individual consent.
Thompson PB
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 9271720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Explaining public resistance to genetically modified corn: an analysis of the distribution of benefits and risks.
Wu F
Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):715-26. PubMed ID: 15209940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature.
Finucane ML; Holup JL
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1603-12. PubMed ID: 15652691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A risk-based classification scheme for genetically modified foods. I: Conceptual development.
Chao E; Krewski D
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 52(3):208-22. PubMed ID: 18778747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
Oeschger MP; Silva CE
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.
Teng PP
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The ethics of biotechnology.
Lenoir N
J Biolaw Bus; 2000; Suppl.():111-5. PubMed ID: 12739544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reactions to genetically modified food crops and how perception of risks and benefits influences consumers' information gathering.
Wilson C; Evans G; Leppard P; Syrette J
Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1311-21. PubMed ID: 15563297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
