These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16297675)

  • 1. Auditory attention to frequency and time: an analogy to visual local-global stimuli.
    Justus T; List A
    Cognition; 2005 Nov; 98(1):31-51. PubMed ID: 16297675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns.
    Robertson LC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1996 Sep; 125(3):227-49. PubMed ID: 8751819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of visual and phonological features on the hemispheric processing of hierarchical Navon letters.
    Aiello M; Merola S; Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():75-85. PubMed ID: 29233717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causal implication by rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation of alpha frequency in feature-based local vs. global attention.
    Romei V; Thut G; Mok RM; Schyns PG; Driver J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 35(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 22394014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of precedence on Navon-induced processing bias in face recognition.
    Perfect TJ; Weston NJ; Dennis I; Snell A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1479-86. PubMed ID: 18609403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory priming of frequency and temporal information: effects of lateralised presentation.
    List A; Justus T
    Laterality; 2007 Nov; 12(6):507-35. PubMed ID: 17852702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global precedence effect in audition and vision: evidence for similar cognitive styles across modalities.
    Bouvet L; Rousset S; Valdois S; Donnadieu S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Oct; 138(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 21943833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forest Before Trees: Letter Stimulus and Sex Modulate Global Precedence in Visual Perception.
    Álvarez-San Millán A; Iglesias J; Gutkin A; Olivares EI
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():546483. PubMed ID: 33841222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does aging affect the allocation of visual attention in global and local information processing?
    Roux F; Ceccaldi M
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Aug; 46(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 11487288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local and global auditory processing: behavioral and ERP evidence.
    Sanders LD; Poeppel D
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1172-86. PubMed ID: 17113115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative priming of temporal local--global levels in auditory hierarchical stimuli.
    List A; Justus T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):193-208. PubMed ID: 20045889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Inhibition of Return and Level-Priming on the Global Precedence Effect.
    Wu Y; Li Q; Liu Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2020; 2020():4817901. PubMed ID: 32952542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond the forest and the trees: local and global interference in hierarchical visual stimuli containing three levels.
    Rijpkema M; van Aalderen S; Schwarzbach J; Verstraten FA
    Perception; 2007; 36(8):1115-22. PubMed ID: 17972477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responses to Navon tasks differ across development and between tasks with differing attentional demands.
    Morris S; Dumontheil I; Farran EK
    Vision Res; 2021 Aug; 185():17-28. PubMed ID: 33878639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms.
    Grahn JA
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 220(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 22623092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.
    Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.