These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16297675)

  • 21. Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology.
    Lux S; Marshall JC; Thimm M; Fink GR
    Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18387528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception.
    Pomerantz JR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Dec; 112(4):516-40. PubMed ID: 6229597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal attention is involved in the enhancement of attentional capture with task difficulty: an event-related brain potential study.
    Sugimoto F; Kimura M; Takeda Y; Katayama J
    Neuroreport; 2017 Aug; 28(12):755-759. PubMed ID: 28682830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inducing attention not to blink: auditory entrainment improves conscious visual processing.
    Ronconi L; Pincham HL; Szűcs D; Facoetti A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):774-84. PubMed ID: 26215434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Shared attentional resources for processing visual and chemosensory information.
    Spence C; Kettenmann B; Kobal G; McGlone FP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):775-83. PubMed ID: 11548034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of a concurrent motor task on auditory and visual temporal discrimination tasks.
    Mioni G; Grassi M; Tarantino V; Stablum F; Grondin S; Bisiacchi PS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):742-8. PubMed ID: 26965441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modality-specific auditory and visual temporal processing deficits.
    Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 11873849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of visual attentional load on low-level auditory scene analysis.
    Dyson BJ; Alain C; He Y
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 5(3):319-38. PubMed ID: 16396093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Campbell TA; Vachon F; Taylor PJ; Hughes RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):350-362. PubMed ID: 31290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: effects of stimulus and task factors.
    Yovel G; Levy J; Yovel I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Dec; 27(6):1369-85. PubMed ID: 11766931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory and visual differences in time perception? An investigation from a developmental perspective with neuropsychological tests.
    Zélanti PS; Droit-Volet S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jul; 112(3):296-311. PubMed ID: 22621934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A nonspatial sound modulates processing of visual distractors in a flanker task.
    Salagovic CA; Leonard CJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):800-809. PubMed ID: 33083988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task.
    Potts GF; Wood SM; Kothmann D; Martin LE
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():126-39. PubMed ID: 18723003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Event-related potentials and audiovisual stimuli: multimodal interactions.
    Czigler I; Balázs L
    Neuroreport; 2001 Feb; 12(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 11209924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of divided attention on auditory priming.
    Mulligan NW; Duke M; Cooper AW
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1245-54. PubMed ID: 18035624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Local-global processing bias is not a unitary individual difference in visual processing.
    Chamberlain R; Van der Hallen R; Huygelier H; Van de Cruys S; Wagemans J
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():247-257. PubMed ID: 28427891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hierarchical Letters in ASD: High Stimulus Variability Under Different Attentional Modes.
    Van der Hallen R; Vanmarcke S; Noens I; Wagemans J
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2017 Jun; 47(6):1854-1865. PubMed ID: 28349364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.