123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1629887)
1. Comparison of office and serial automatic blood pressure readings in renovascular and essential hypertension.
Vreugdenhil G; Schrey G; de Leeuw PW
J Hum Hypertens; 1992 Jun; 6(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 1629887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure.
Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Home blood pressure: variability, comparison with office readings and proposal for reference values. Groupe de la Mesure, French Society of Hypertension.
de Gaudemaris R; Chau NP; Mallion JM
J Hypertens; 1994 Jul; 12(7):831-8. PubMed ID: 7963513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of circadian blood pressure variations in hypertensive patients with renal artery stenosis and essential hypertension.
Doll G; Mycinski C; Cosnay P; Alison D; Raynaud P; Brochier M
J Hum Hypertens; 1990 Aug; 4(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 2258881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Difference between home and office blood pressures among treated hypertensive patients from the Japan Home versus Office Blood Pressure Measurement Evaluation (J-HOME) study.
Horikawa T; Obara T; Ohkubo T; Asayama K; Metoki H; Inoue R; Kikuya M; Hashimoto J; Totsune K; Imai Y;
Hypertens Res; 2008 Jun; 31(6):1115-23. PubMed ID: 18716359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the elderly hypertensive patient.
Torriani S; Waeber B; Petrillo A; Di Stefano R; Mooser V; Scherrer U; Nussberger J; Hofstetter JR; Brunner HR
J Hypertens Suppl; 1988 Nov; 6(1):S25-7. PubMed ID: 3216238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lack of effect of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty on nocturnal hypotension in renovascular hypertensive patients.
Ravogli A; Arzilli F; Omboni S; Giovannetti R; Mutti E; Salvetti A; Mancia G
J Hypertens; 1996 Jan; 14(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 12013495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients.
Loubser PG
Med Instrum; 1986; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effects of RNA interference targeting angiotensin 1a receptor on the blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy of rats with 2K1C hypertension].
Zhang JQ; Sun HL; Ma YX; Wang DW
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(16):1138-43. PubMed ID: 16796846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Office blood pressure underestimates ambulatory blood pressure in peripheral arterial disease in comparison to healthy controls.
Svensson P; de Faire U; Niklasson U; Ostergren J
J Hum Hypertens; 2004 Mar; 18(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 14973514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer.
Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 19020423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of patient-recorded home blood pressure series in distinguishing sustained from office hypertension: effects on diagnosis and treatment of mild hypertension. Bath District Hypertension Study Group.
Hall CL; Higgs CM; Notarianni L
J Hum Hypertens; 1990 Jun; 4 Suppl 2():9-13. PubMed ID: 2370648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectral analysis of the systolic blood pressure signal in secondary hypertension: a method for the identification of phaeochromocytoma.
Meisel SR; Mor-Avi V; Rosenthal T; Akselrod S
J Hypertens; 1994 Mar; 12(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 8021480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term blood pressure variability in renovascular hypertension and in severe and mild essential hypertension.
Mussalo H; Vanninen E; Ikäheimo R; Laitinen T; Hartikainen J
Clin Sci (Lond); 2003 Nov; 105(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 12837130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Computer-assisted assessment of the 24-hour blood pressure profile in essential and secondary hypertensive patients].
Staschen CM; Spieker C; Zidek W; Vetter H
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Dec; 117(49):1946-8. PubMed ID: 3321429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diurnal and short-term variation of blood pressure: comparison of preeclamptic, chronic hypertensive, and normotensive patients.
Sawyer MM; Lipshitz J; Anderson GD; Dilts PV; Halperin L
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Sep; 58(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 7266948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variability of indirect methods used to determine blood pressure. Office vs mean 24-hour automated blood pressures.
Bottini PB; Carr AA; Rhoades RB; Prisant LM
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 152(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 1728909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Home and office blood pressure in children and adolescents: the role of obesity. The Arsakeion School Study.
Karatzi K; Protogerou A; Rarra V; Stergiou GS
J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Aug; 23(8):512-20. PubMed ID: 19129855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
