These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16298886)

  • 21. Emotionally arousing stimuli compete for attention with left hemispace.
    Hartikainen KM; Ogawa KH; Soltani M; Knight RT
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1929-33. PubMed ID: 18007189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lexical competition is enhanced in the left hemisphere: evidence from different types of orthographic neighbors.
    Perea M; Acha J; Fraga I
    Brain Lang; 2008 Jun; 105(3):199-210. PubMed ID: 17905425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of hemispheric activation in person perception: evidence for an attentional focus model.
    Bourgeois MJ; Christman S; Horowitz IA
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Nov; 38(2):202-19. PubMed ID: 9853097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lateralized responses during covert attention are modulated by target eccentricity.
    Bahramisharif A; Heskes T; Jensen O; van Gerven MA
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 491(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 21215296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Processing emotion from the eyes: a divided visual field and ERP study.
    Beaton AA; Fouquet NC; Maycock NC; Platt E; Payne LS; Derrett A
    Laterality; 2012; 17(4):486-514. PubMed ID: 21337252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hemispheric cooperation in visuospatial rotations: evidence for a manipulation role for the left hemisphere and a reference role for the right hemisphere.
    Cook ND; Früh H; Mehr A; Regard M; Landis T
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Jul; 25(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 7917245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sustained attention to local and global target features is different: performance and tympanic membrane temperature.
    Helton WS; Hayrynen L; Schaeffer D
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Oct; 71(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19329239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptual asymmetries influence task choice: the effect of lateralised presentation of hierarchical stimuli.
    Arrington CM; Rhodes KM
    Laterality; 2010 Sep; 15(5):501-13. PubMed ID: 19557621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficiency of callosal transfer and hemispheric interaction.
    Cherbuin N; Brinkman C
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Mar; 20(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 16594778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relationships between brain morphology and behavioral measures of hemispheric asymmetry and interhemispheric interaction.
    Hellige JB; Taylor KB; Lesmes L; Peterson S
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Mar; 36(2):158-92. PubMed ID: 9520312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing.
    Peyrin C; Mermillod M; Chokron S; Marendaz C
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Dec; 62(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 16837115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The association between stress, hemispheric specialization, and callosal interactions.
    Leavengood A; Weekes NY
    Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):306-10. PubMed ID: 10857714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in vision and visual imagery.
    Michimata C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Apr; 33(3):370-87. PubMed ID: 9126401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Reaction time experiment on absolute or relative functional specialization of the cerebral hemispheres in man].
    Anzola GP; Casco C; Luppino G; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1980 Jul; 56(13):1420-5. PubMed ID: 7448038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hemispheric priming in a reading task.
    Coney J
    Brain Lang; 1998 Mar; 62(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 9570878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Disentangling the relationship between hemispheric asymmetry and cognitive performance.
    Hirnstein M; Leask S; Rose J; Hausmann M
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Jul; 73(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 20472334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Integration and interference in the cerebral hemispheres: relations with hemispheric specialization.
    Grimshaw GM
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Mar; 36(2):108-27. PubMed ID: 9520310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The bilateral effect: callosal inhibition or intrahemispheric competition?
    Olk B; Hartje W
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Apr; 45(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 11305876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.