These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16298920)

  • 41. Establishing a training program for residents in robotic surgery.
    Moles JJ; Connelly PE; Sarti EE; Baredes S
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Oct; 119(10):1927-31. PubMed ID: 19655337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of video lag on laparoscopic surgery: correlation between performance and usability at low latencies.
    Kumcu A; Vermeulen L; Elprama SA; Duysburgh P; Platiša L; Van Nieuwenhove Y; Van De Winkel N; Jacobs A; Van Looy J; Philips W
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Jun; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 27373237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. TeleRobotic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS): effects of time delay--pilot study.
    Lum MJ; Rosen J; Lendvay TS; Wright AS; Sinanan MN; Hannaford B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():5597-600. PubMed ID: 19163986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Regarding "Application of robotic telemanipulation system in vascular interventional surgery".
    Lu WS; Wang DM; Liu D; Zhao DP; Tian ZM; Gao BF; Zhang LL; Zeng YJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 May; 57(5):1452-3. PubMed ID: 23601603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A simulation framework for tool tissue interactions in robotic surgery.
    Sankaranarayanan G; Arikatla VS; De S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 173():440-4. PubMed ID: 22357033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Usability of robotic platforms for remote surgical teleproctoring.
    Ereso AQ; Garcia P; Tseng E; Dua MM; Victorino GP; Guy LT
    Telemed J E Health; 2009 Jun; 15(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 19548825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer(®) simulator.
    Xu S; Perez M; Yang K; Perrenot C; Felblinger J; Hubert J
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2569-76. PubMed ID: 24671353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Pilot study on verification of effectiveness on operability of assistance system for robotic tele-surgery using simulation.
    Kawamura K; Kobayashi Y; Fujie MG
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2308-12. PubMed ID: 21096798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Efficient force feedback transmission system for tele surgery.
    Natarajan S; Ganz A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3245-8. PubMed ID: 19163399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Network latency and long-distance robotic telestenting: Exploring the potential impact of network delays on telestenting performance.
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Bush J; Martin S; Rash AJ; Tan JM; Parker JL; Kalafut A; Li Y; Kottenstette N; Bergman P; Nowak B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 95(5):914-919. PubMed ID: 31410958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of delayed visual feedback on telerobotic surgery.
    Kim T; Zimmerman PM; Wade MJ; Weiss CA
    Surg Endosc; 2005 May; 19(5):683-6. PubMed ID: 15776211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Telemedicine and robotics: paving the way to the globalization of surgery.
    Senapati S; Advincula AP
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 91(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 16213505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Operability evaluation using an simulation system for gripping motion in robotic tele-surgery.
    Kawamura K; Kobayashi Y; Fujie MG
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():5106-9. PubMed ID: 19963881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Multistep prediction of physiological tremor for surgical robotics applications.
    Veluvolu KC; Tatinati S; Hong SM; Ang WT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Nov; 60(11):3074-82. PubMed ID: 23771303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of time delay on surgical performance during telesurgical manipulation.
    Fabrizio MD; Lee BR; Chan DY; Stoianovici D; Jarrett TW; Yang C; Kavoussi LR
    J Endourol; 2000 Mar; 14(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 10772504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of network performance on remote robotic-assisted endovascular interventions in porcine model.
    Legeza P; Britz GW; Shah A; Sconzert K; Sungur JM; Chinnadurai P; Sinha K; Lumsden AB
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 33550514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Human/robotic interaction: vision limits performance in simulated vitreoretinal surgery.
    de Smet MD; de Jonge N; Iannetta D; Faridpooya K; van Oosterhout E; Naus G; Meenink TCM; Mura M; Beelen MJ
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 97(7):672-678. PubMed ID: 30588753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of unmanned airborne vehicles and mobile robotic telesurgery in an extreme environment.
    Harnett BM; Doarn CR; Rosen J; Hannaford B; Broderick TJ
    Telemed J E Health; 2008 Aug; 14(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 18729752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Performance metrics for guidance active constraints in surgical robotics.
    Enayati N; Ferrigno G; De Momi E
    Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29193643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation.
    Scholcover F; Gillan DJ
    Hum Factors; 2018 Feb; 60(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 28967794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.