These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16300124)

  • 21. Soft tissue norms: Conventional and based on true vertical in a Lebanese population.
    El Hayeck E; Bassil-Nassif N; Bouserhal J
    Int Orthod; 2016 Sep; 14(3):311-27. PubMed ID: 27520715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis.
    Lundström F; Lundström A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Mar; 101(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 1539551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variation in cephalometric reference lines.
    Foster TD; Howat AP; Naish PJ
    Br J Orthod; 1981 Oct; 8(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 6945130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls.
    Hägg U; Cooke MS; Chan TC; Tng TT; Lau PY
    Aust Orthod J; 1998 Oct; 15(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10204427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Natural head position and natural head orientation: basic considerations in cephalometric analysis and research.
    Lundström A; Lundström F; Lebret LM; Moorrees CF
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 7781719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Atlas morphology in relation to craniofacial morphology and head posture.
    Sandikçioğlu M; Skov S; Solow B
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 8005204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An evaluation of head position and craniofacial reference line variation.
    Barbera AL; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC
    Homo; 2009; 60(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 18977477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The correlation between surface measurement of head and neck posture and the anatomic position of the upper cervical vertebrae.
    Johnson GM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(8):921-7. PubMed ID: 9580960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of the anteroposterior soft-tissue contour of the lower facial third in the ideal young adult.
    Spradley FL; Jacobs JD; Crowe DP
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Mar; 79(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 6938139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reference structures for assessment of frontal head posture.
    Zepa I; Huggare J
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Dec; 20(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 9926636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Measurement errors in 2D cephalometrics].
    Bourriau J; Bidange G; Foucart JM
    Orthod Fr; 2012 Mar; 83(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 22455648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A longitudinal study of 5 cephalometric plane angles in female children from 7 to 12 years old].
    Peng J; Deng H; Cao C
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Jun; 20(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 12600065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in craniofacial characteristics in Southern Italian children from Naples: a retrospective study by cephalometric analysis.
    Perillo L; Isola G; Esercizio D; Iovane M; Triolo G; Matarese G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 24295003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The measurement of craniocervical posture: a simple method to evaluate head position.
    Cuccia AM; Carola C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1732-6. PubMed ID: 19786307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Craniofacial characteristics in the sagittal dimension: A cephalometric study in Lebanese young adults.
    Daraze A; Delatte M; Bou Saba S; Majzoub Z
    Int Orthod; 2017 Mar; 15(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 28065707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric assessment of effect of head rotation toward focal spot on lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Naresh V; Lokesh NK; Pratapvarma KV; Srikrishna C; Chakravarthy VG; Shamnur N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 23811646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Four measurements for assessing facial deformity.
    Fanibunda KB
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec; 17(6):483-90. PubMed ID: 8682164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of facial form modifications in orthodontics: proposal of a modified computerized mesh diagram analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Dalloca LL; DeFranco DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Mar; 109(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 8607471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Skeletal-versus soft-tissue-based cephalometric analyses: is the correlation reproducible?
    Ploder O; Köhnke R; Winsauer H; Götz C; Bissinger O; Haller B; Kolk A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Mar; 77(2):135-141. PubMed ID: 30394163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.