BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

914 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16300323)

  • 21. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision].
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Oct; 99(10):371-4. PubMed ID: 11820006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combined amalgam and composite restorations.
    Abu-Hanna AA; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):342-4. PubMed ID: 15195736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Next generation of dentists moving to amalgam-free dentistry: Survey of posterior restorations teaching in North America.
    Zabrovsky A; Neeman Levy T; Bar-On H; Beyth N; Ben-Gal G
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2019 Aug; 23(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 31009156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Teaching of posterior composite resin restorations in undergraduate dental schools in Ireland and the United Kingdom.
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ; Wilson NH
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 16436083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Teaching of direct posterior resin composite restorations in UK dental therapy training programmes.
    Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 20448613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam.
    Wahl MJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):525-35. PubMed ID: 11495565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Teaching the use of resin composites in Canadian dental schools: how do current educational practices compare with North American trends?
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ; Hannigan A; Wilson NH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 May; 72(4):321. PubMed ID: 16684474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trends in material choice for direct restorations by final year students from University College Cork 2004-2009.
    O'Sullivan CO; McKenna GJ; Burke FM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 22474934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Has resin-based composite replaced amalgam?
    Christensen GJ; Child PL
    Dent Today; 2010 Feb; 29(2):108, 110. PubMed ID: 20196340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 4: clinical factor.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Sep; 62(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28437002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Composite veneering of complex amalgam restorations.
    Demarco FF; Zanchi CH; Bueno M; Piva E
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 17288335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The teaching of posterior composites: A survey of dental schools in Oceania.
    Loch C; Liaw Y; Metussin AP; Lynch CD; Wilson N; Blum IR; Brunton PA
    J Dent; 2019 May; 84():36-43. PubMed ID: 30690112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Placement of posterior resin restorations should be limited to dentists.
    Benjamin GC
    N Y State Dent J; 2008 Jan; 74(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 18404829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Teaching posterior composite resin restorations in the United Kingdom and Ireland: consensus views of teachers.
    Lynch CD; Shortall AC; Stewardson D; Tomson PL; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2007 Aug; 203(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 17721472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations.
    Dilley DC; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Crisp RM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 2345211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Esthetic composite resin facings for amalgam restorations.
    Lambert RL; Scrabeck JG; Robinson FB
    Gen Dent; 1983; 31(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 6575935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Amalgam vs. composite resin: 1998.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Dec; 129(12):1757-9. PubMed ID: 9854929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.