BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16301103)

  • 1. The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice.
    Zraick RI; Wendel K; Smith-Olinde L
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):574-81. PubMed ID: 16301103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15766846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of task on determination of habitual loudness.
    Zraick RI; Marshall W; Smith-Olinde L; Montague JC
    J Voice; 2004 Jun; 18(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 15193650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality.
    Bele IV
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):555-73. PubMed ID: 16301102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task specificity in adductor spasmodic dysphonia versus muscle tension dysphonia.
    Roy N; Gouse M; Mauszycki SC; Merrill RM; Smith ME
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Feb; 115(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 15689757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.
    Brinca LF; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Gonçalves IC; Moreno ML
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24491499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
    Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of speaking sample duration on determination of habitual pitch.
    Zraick RI; Birdwell KY; Smith-Olinde L
    J Voice; 2005 Jun; 19(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 15907434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of speaking and maximum voice range measures in screening for dysphonia.
    Ma E; Robertson J; Radford C; Vagne S; El-Halabi R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2007 Jul; 21(4):397-406. PubMed ID: 16678387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of speaking context on elicitation of habitual pitch.
    Zraick RI; Gentry MA; Smith-Olinde L; Gregg BA
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):545-54. PubMed ID: 16274957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
    Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V.
    Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):e7-14. PubMed ID: 20430573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.