BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16301773)

  • 1. How do we get the medical intelligence out?
    Oppenheimer A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 118():111-21. PubMed ID: 16301773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eager sellers and stony buyers: understanding the psychology of new-product adoption.
    Gourville JT
    Harv Bus Rev; 2006 Jun; 84(6):98-106, 145. PubMed ID: 16770897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ergonomically sound medical devices.
    Hearne D
    Med Device Technol; 2004 May; 15(4):32-3. PubMed ID: 15303563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Designing the design phase of critical care devices: a cognitive approach.
    Malhotra S; Laxmisan A; Keselman A; Zhang J; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 15694884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [On meeting sanitary legal requirements in technical regulation of medical equipment safety].
    Kravchenko OK; Prokopenko LV
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2007; (7):21-7. PubMed ID: 17802737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid medical advances challenge the tooling industry.
    Conley B
    Med Device Technol; 2008; 19(3):32-3. PubMed ID: 18557407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defeating feature fatigue.
    Rust RT; Thompson DV; Hamilton RW
    Harv Bus Rev; 2006 Feb; 84(2):98-107, 165. PubMed ID: 16485808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Questionnaire survey of customer satisfaction for product categories towards certification of ergonomic quality in design.
    Mochimaru M; Takahashi M; Hatakenaka N; Horiuchi H
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():956-9. PubMed ID: 22316844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The voice of the customer: consumers define the ideal battery charger.
    Lane JP; Usiak DJ; Stone VI; Scherer MJ
    Assist Technol; 1997; 9(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 10177450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Designing for the user.
    Kortstra JR
    Med Device Technol; 1995; 6(1):22-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10155371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human factors engineering for designing the next in medicine.
    Lai F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 125():262-4. PubMed ID: 17377281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health technology assessment from a Canadian device industry perspective.
    Ferrusi IL; Ames D; Lim ME; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 19394576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of usability in product choice: a mobile phone case study.
    Mack Z; Sharples S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1514-28. PubMed ID: 19941184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shifts in sensory dominance between various stages of user-product interactions.
    Fenko A; Schifferstein HN; Hekkert P
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19406380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging systems: evaluation of 1.5-Tesla systems.
    Health Devices; 2006 Jun; 35(6):189-230. PubMed ID: 16893049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health Technology Assessment: managing the introduction and use of medical devices in clinical practice in Italy.
    Migliore A; Ratti M; Cerbo M; Jefferson T
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 May; 6(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19419283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The behavioral economics of consumer brand choice: patterns of reinforcement and utility maximization.
    Foxall GR; Oliveira-Castro JM; Schrezenmaier TC
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):235-60. PubMed ID: 15157975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hold, grasp, clutch or grab: consumer grip choices during food container opening.
    Rowson J; Yoxall A
    Appl Ergon; 2011 Jul; 42(5):627-33. PubMed ID: 21211788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.