138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16302456)
1. Transportation of curved canals instrumented with manual and mechanical techniques.
Leonardi LE; Atlas DM; Raiden G
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16302456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Apical transportation: a comparative evaluation of three root canal instrumentation techniques with three different apical diameters.
López FU; Fachin EV; Camargo Fontanella VR; Barletta FB; Só MV; Grecca FS
J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1545-8. PubMed ID: 19026892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
Cheung GS; Chan AW
J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth.
Kummer TR; Calvo MC; Cordeiro MM; de Sousa Vieira R; de Carvalho Rocha MJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):e84-92. PubMed ID: 18329573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of maintaining apical patency on canal transportation.
Tsesis I; Amdor B; Tamse A; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 18312378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of two techniques for endodontic instrumentation.
Naigeboren D; Bulacio MA; de la Casa ML; Leonardi L; Costa L
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 1999; 12(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 12905913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
Aydin B; Köse T; Calişkan MK
Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1050-6. PubMed ID: 19825041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals.
Coleman CL; Svec TA
J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9594772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of a manual glide path on the preparation of curved root canals by using Mtwo rotary instruments.
Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
J Endod; 2009 May; 35(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 19410086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Barbakow F; Peters OA
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):456-64. PubMed ID: 15946266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals.
Campos JM; del Rio C
J Endod; 1990 May; 16(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 2074418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dentine removal in the coronal portion of root canals following two preparation techniques.
Plotino G; Grande NM; Falanga A; Di Giuseppe IL; Lamorgese V; Somma F
Int Endod J; 2007 Nov; 40(11):852-8. PubMed ID: 17697107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals.
Weiger R; ElAyouti A; Löst C
J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):580-3. PubMed ID: 12184418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.
Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM
J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
