121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16302534)
21. Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.
Lee YS
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 17475195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rehearsal strategies can enlarge or diminish the spacing effect: pure versus mixed lists and encoding strategy.
Delaney PF; Verkoeijen PP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1148-61. PubMed ID: 19686011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of reminding in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall: sufficient but not necessary.
Wahlheim CN; Maddox GB; Jacoby LL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 23937236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.
Toppino TC; Pagano MJ
Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect: a multinomial processing tree analysis.
Küpper-Tetzel CE; Erdfelder E
Memory; 2012; 20(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 22171809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. For whom the bell (curve) tolls: cortisol rapidly affects memory retrieval by an inverted U-shaped dose-response relationship.
Schilling TM; Kölsch M; Larra MF; Zech CM; Blumenthal TD; Frings C; Schächinger H
Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2013 Sep; 38(9):1565-72. PubMed ID: 23374327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The spacing effect in young children's free recall: support for automatic-process explanations.
Toppino TC
Mem Cognit; 1991 Mar; 19(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 2017039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Modification of performance by activation in the elderly].
Hüppe M; Schmidt-Atzert L
Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 8705813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Deficits in memory retrieval: an argument in favor of frontal subcortical dysfunction in depression].
Fossati P; Deweer B; Raoux N; Allilaire JF
Encephale; 1995; 21(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 7588169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effects of list length and output order.
Ward G; Tan L; Grenfell-Essam R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1207-41. PubMed ID: 20804293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Negative recency effects in delayed recognition: Spacing, consolidation, and retrieval strategy processes.
Sheaffer R; Levy DA
Mem Cognit; 2022 Nov; 50(8):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 35277835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults.
Logan JM; Balota DA
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 May; 15(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 18421627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Neural mechanisms of the spacing effect in episodic memory: A parallel EEG and fMRI study.
Zhao X; Wang C; Liu Q; Xiao X; Jiang T; Chen C; Xue G
Cortex; 2015 Aug; 69():76-92. PubMed ID: 25989444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Examining the relationship between word learning, nonword repetition, and immediate serial recall in adults.
Gupta P
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Oct; 56(7):1213-36. PubMed ID: 12959911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mixed-handedness advantages in episodic memory obtained under conditions of intentional learning extend to incidental learning.
Christman SD; Butler M
Brain Cogn; 2011 Oct; 77(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 21807450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impaired intentional content learning but spared incidental retention of contextual information in non-demented patients with Parkinson's disease.
Vingerhoets G; Vermeule E; Santens P
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):675-81. PubMed ID: 15721180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Learning under stress: the inverted-U-shape function revisited.
Salehi B; Cordero MI; Sandi C
Learn Mem; 2010 Oct; 17(10):522-30. PubMed ID: 20884754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of prior knowledge on study-time allocation and free recall: investigating the discrepancy reduction model.
Verkoeijen PP; Rikers RM; Schmidt HG
J Psychol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 15751831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Judgements of relative direction: the effect of task instructions on spatial recall.
Donaldson P; Tlauka M; Robertson C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1090-103. PubMed ID: 23057609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
