These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16302535)

  • 1. Blocking is sensitive to causal structure in 4-year-old and 8-year-old children.
    Beckers T; Van den Broeck U; Renne M; Vandorpe S; De Houwer J; Eelen P
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(4):264-71. PubMed ID: 16302535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forward blocking in human learning sometimes reflects the failure to encode a cue-outcome relationship.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF; Minard E; Lavis Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):830-44. PubMed ID: 16608749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning.
    De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Nov; 56(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 14578079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encouraging children to think counterfactually enhances blocking in a causal learning task.
    McCormack T; Simms V; McGourty J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1910-26. PubMed ID: 23425340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Backward versus forward blocking: evidence for performance-based models of human contingency learning.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Dec; 109(3):1001-16. PubMed ID: 22420128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude.
    Lovibond PE; Been SL; Mitchell CJ; Bouton ME; Frohardt R
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 12699149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aging and associative binding in contingency learning.
    Mutter SA; Arnold JP
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2021 Sep; 28(5):701-716. PubMed ID: 32873125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Associative repetition priming as a measure of human contingency learning: evidence of forward and backward blocking.
    Morís J; Cobos PL; Luque D; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 23230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning.
    Beckers T; De Houwer J; Pineño O; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 15755242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blocking of human causal learning involves learned changes in stimulus processing.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Suret MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1468-76. PubMed ID: 17853191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blocking in children's causal learning depends on working memory and reasoning abilities.
    McCormack T; Simms V; McGourty J; Beckers T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Jul; 115(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 23499322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blocking in human causal learning is affected by outcome assumptions manipulated through causal structure.
    Blanco F; Baeyens F; Beckers T
    Learn Behav; 2014 Jun; 42(2):185-99. PubMed ID: 24737045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Oct; 55(4):311-29. PubMed ID: 12350284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Additivity pretraining and cue competition effects: developmental evidence for a reasoning-based account of causal learning.
    Simms V; McCormack T; Beckers T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 22329707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial separation of target and competitor cues enhances blocking of human causality judgements.
    Glautier S
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Apr; 55(2):121-35. PubMed ID: 12075979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements.
    Livesey EJ; Boakes RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Oct; 57(4):361-79. PubMed ID: 15513261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aging and the detection of contingency in causal learning.
    Mutter SA; Williams TW
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 15065928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.
    Vadillo MA; Matute H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue competition effects and young children's causal and counterfactual inferences.
    McCormack T; Butterfill S; Hoerl C; Burns P
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Nov; 45(6):1563-75. PubMed ID: 19899914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.