These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16302627)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty.
    Neal CJ; Rosner MK; Kuklo TR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Nov; 3(5):342-7. PubMed ID: 16302627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of adjacent segments after cervical disc arthroplasty: magnet strength and its effect on image quality. Clinical article.
    Antosh IJ; DeVine JG; Carpenter CT; Woebkenberg BJ; Yoest SM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):722-6. PubMed ID: 21121749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine: a prospective comparison of fast T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted turbo spin echo MR imaging.
    Erdem LO; Erdem CZ; Acikgoz B; Gundogdu S
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 16036160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of symptomatic adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with total disc arthroplasty by using the prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Fenk-Mayer A; Eerulkar J; Emerson JW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16506474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total disc replacement arthroplasty using the AcroFlex lumbar disc: a non-human primate model.
    Cunningham BW; Lowery GL; Serhan HA; Dmitriev AE; Orbegoso CM; McAfee PC; Fraser RD; Ross RE; Kulkarni SS
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct; 11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S115-23. PubMed ID: 12384732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2192-9. PubMed ID: 16205346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
    Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices.
    Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Lynch JJ; Haid RW; Heller JG; Riew KD; Seex K; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 17413473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts.
    Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of T1-weighted fast spin-echo and T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images of the lumbar spine at 3.0 Tesla.
    Lavdas E; Vlychou M; Arikidis N; Kapsalaki E; Roka V; Fezoulidis IV
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 20170294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
    Carlisle E; Luna M; Tsou PM; Wang JC
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16291099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial.
    Delamarter RB; Fribourg DM; Kanim LE; Bae H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S167-75. PubMed ID: 14560188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Nanieva R; Fenk-Mayer A; Husted DS; Shah RV; Emerson JW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16506473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of sagittal alignment on kinematic changes and degree of disc degeneration in the lumbar spine: an analysis using positional MRI.
    Keorochana G; Taghavi CE; Lee KB; Yoo JH; Liao JC; Fei Z; Wang JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(11):893-8. PubMed ID: 21242877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinematics of a selectively constrained radiolucent anterior lumbar disc: comparisons to hybrid and circumferential fusion.
    Daftari TK; Chinthakunta SR; Ingalhalikar A; Gudipally M; Hussain M; Khalil S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Oct; 27(8):759-65. PubMed ID: 22748372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of sagittal endplate shape on lumbar segmental mobility as evaluated by kinetic magnetic resonance imaging.
    Li Y; Lord E; Cohen Y; Ruangchainikom M; Wang B; Lv G; Wang JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(17):E1035-41. PubMed ID: 24859573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.