These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16304088)

  • 1. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.
    Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Adamek HE; Jakobs R; Pfeifer B; Eickhoff A; Zindel C; Riemann JF; Layer G
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 16304088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience.
    Lauenstein TC; Herborn CU; Vogt FM; Göhde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
    Rofo; 2001 Sep; 173(9):785-9. PubMed ID: 11582556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection.
    Ajaj W; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Goyen M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1088-94. PubMed ID: 17031836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening of colonic tumors by air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography.
    Lam WW; Leung WK; Wu JK; So NM; Sung JJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Apr; 19(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 15065168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dark lumen MR colonography: can high spatial resolution VIBE imaging improve the detection of colorectal masses?
    Ajaj W; Rühm SG; Papanikolaou N; Lauenstein TC; Gerken G; Goyen M
    Rofo; 2006 Nov; 178(11):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17128377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incomplete conventional colonoscopy: magnetic resonance colonography in the evaluation of the proximal colon.
    Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Pfeiffer B; Jakobs R; Eickhoff A; Riemann JF; Layer G
    Endoscopy; 2005 Sep; 37(9):816-20. PubMed ID: 16116531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of colonic masses with MR colonography.
    Haykir R; Karaköse S; Karabacakoğlu A; Kayaçetin E; Sahin M
    Turk J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 17(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16941252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital subtraction dark-lumen MR colonography: initial experience.
    Ajaj W; Veit P; Kuehle C; Joekel M; Lauenstein TC; Herborn CU
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jun; 21(6):841-4. PubMed ID: 15906327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?
    Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Goehde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 14745756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
    Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.
    Florie J; Jensch S; Nievelstein RA; Bartelsman JF; Baak LC; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; van Randen A; van der Ham MM; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 17329686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy.
    Florie J; Birnie E; van Gelder RE; Jensch S; Haberkorn B; Bartelsman JF; van der Sluys Veer A; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bonsel GJ; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 17885188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.
    Goehde SC; Descher E; Boekstegers A; Lauenstein T; Kühle C; Ruehm SG; Ajaj W
    Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 15759203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality.
    Saar B; Gschossmann JM; Bonel HM; Kickuth R; Vock P; Netzer P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):580-6. PubMed ID: 18648258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report.
    Luboldt W; Steiner P; Bauerfeind P; Pelkonen P; Debatin JF
    Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 9530299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography.
    Luboldt W; Bauerfeind P; Wildermuth S; Marincek B; Fried M; Debatin JF
    Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 10924558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.
    Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Holtmann G; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Goehde SC
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 15591429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
    Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.
    Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Carbone I; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Di Giulio E; Schillaci A; Passariello R
    Endoscopy; 2002 Jun; 34(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 12048624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [MR-colonography in hospitalized patients: feasibility and sensitivity].
    Kerker J; Albes G; Roer N; Montag M; Budde T; Schaefer A
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 18393151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.