These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16304317)

  • 1. The physical and biological doses of methacholine are different for Mefar MB3 and Jaeger APS sidestream nebulizers.
    Praml G; Scharrer E; de la Motte D; Nowak D; Scheuch G; Sommerer K; Radon K
    Chest; 2005 Nov; 128(5):3585-9. PubMed ID: 16304317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.
    Dell SD; Bola SS; Foty RG; Marshall LC; Nelligan KA; Coates AL
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Mar; 12(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 25575246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methacholine challenge--comparison of an ATS protocol to a new rapid single concentration technique.
    Schulze J; Rosewich M; Riemer C; Dressler M; Rose MA; Zielen S
    Respir Med; 2009 Dec; 103(12):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19596563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults.
    Siersted HC; Walker CM; O'Shaughnessy AD; Willan AR; Wiecek EM; Sears MR
    Eur Respir J; 2000 Jan; 15(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 10678643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD
    Davis BE; Simonson SK; Blais CM; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2017 Dec; 152(6):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 28923758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.
    Blais CM; Cockcroft DW; Veilleux J; Boulay MÈ; Boulet LP; Gauvreau GM; Scime TX; Watson RM; O'Byrne PM; Davis BE
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2018 Apr; 31(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 28813613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standardizing dose in dosimetric bronchial challenge tests.
    Malmberg LP; Kauppi P; Mäkelä MJ
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Sep; 38(5):903-906. PubMed ID: 29345046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a 1-concentration-4-step dosimeter protocol for methacholine testing.
    Merget R; Jörres RA; Heinze E; Haufs MG; Taeger D; Brüning T
    Respir Med; 2009 Apr; 103(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 19010655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of particle size on measurement of airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine.
    Naji N; Keung E; Beaudin S; Kane J; Killian KJ; Gauvreau GM
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2013 May; 110(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 23622007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Challenging the two-minute tidal breathing challenge test.
    Lexmond AJ; Hagedoorn P; Frijlink HW; de Boer AH
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2013 Dec; 26(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 23509936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methacholine dry powder inhaler as a new tool for bronchial challenge test.
    Colombo G; Terzano C; Colombo P; Petroianni A; Ricci A; Buttini F
    Int J Pharm; 2008 Mar; 352(1-2):165-71. PubMed ID: 18055141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different response to doubling and fourfold dose increases in methacholine provocation tests in healthy subjects.
    Sundblad BM; Malmberg P; Larsson K
    Chest; 2000 Nov; 118(5):1371-7. PubMed ID: 11083688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in nebulizer output and weight output from Mefar dosimeter: implications for multicentre studies.
    Ward RJ; Reid DW; Walters EH
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Oct; 10(10):2436-7. PubMed ID: 9387980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations.
    Todd DC; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):517-9. PubMed ID: 15356550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculation of provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1): comparison of lowest vs highest post-challenge FEV(1).
    Davis BE; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2000 Mar; 117(3):881-3. PubMed ID: 10713019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the Yan and a dosimeter method for methacholine challenge in experienced and inexperienced subjects.
    Knox AJ; Wisniewski A; Cooper S; Tattersfield AE
    Eur Respir J; 1991 Apr; 4(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 1855579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methacholine challenge methods.
    Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2008 Oct; 134(4):678-680. PubMed ID: 18842907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetry counts: molecular hypersensitivity may not drive pulmonary hyperresponsiveness.
    Moss OR; Oldham MJ
    J Aerosol Med; 2006; 19(4):555-64. PubMed ID: 17196083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two methacholine challenge methods using Spira-2 or Mefar dosimeter.
    Jõgi R; Janson C; Hedenström H
    Clin Physiol; 1999 Jul; 19(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 10451790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulated obesity-related changes in lung volume increases airway responsiveness in lean, nonasthmatic subjects.
    Wang LY; Cerny FJ; Kufel TJ; Grant BJ
    Chest; 2006 Sep; 130(3):834-40. PubMed ID: 16963683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.