220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16306529)
1. Jumping frogs, endangered toads, and California's medical-marijuana law.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2005 Nov; 353(21):2291-6. PubMed ID: 16306529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical marijuana and the Supreme Court.
Okie S
N Engl J Med; 2005 Aug; 353(7):648-51. PubMed ID: 16107619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. California's Compassionate Use Act and the federal government's medical marijuana policy: can California physicians recommend marijuana to their patients without subjecting themselves to sanctions?
Rojas LM
McGeorge Law Rev; 1999; 30(4):1373-425. PubMed ID: 15709269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Court decision on medical marijuana use worries patient advocates.
Krisberg K
Nations Health; 2005 Aug; 35(6):1,14. PubMed ID: 16130240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Gonzales v. Raich: federalism as a casualty of the war on drugs.
Somin I
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2006; 15(3):507-50. PubMed ID: 17593582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Congress, controlled substances, and physician-assisted suicide--elephants in mouseholes.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 16525147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Can Congress regulate "inactivity" (and make Americans buy health insurance)?
Jost TS
N Engl J Med; 2011 Mar; 364(9):e17. PubMed ID: 21323534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reefer madness--the federal response to California's medical-marijuana law.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 9241134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Supreme Court rejects attack on medical marijuana.
Wolski K
N J Nurse; 2003 Dec; 33(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 14746112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tobacco, public health, and the FDA.
Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Drazen JM
N Engl J Med; 2009 Jul; 361(4):402-3. PubMed ID: 19546344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Gonzales v. Raich. In the Supreme Court of the United States.
Bostrom BA
Issues Law Med; 2005; 21(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 16173504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical marijuana, American federalism, and the Supreme Court.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2005 Aug; 294(7):842-4. PubMed ID: 16106011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. State medical marijuana laws: understanding the laws and their limitations.
Pacula RL; Chriqui JF; Reichmann DA; Terry-McElrath YM
J Public Health Policy; 2002; 23(4):413-39. PubMed ID: 12532682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The legal status of medical marijuana.
Seamon MJ
Ann Pharmacother; 2006 Dec; 40(12):2211-5. PubMed ID: 17062830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical marijuana: Federal, State attacks against California cannabis clubs.
Gardner F; James JS
AIDS Treat News; 1998 Jan; (No 287):1-4. PubMed ID: 11365003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ashcroft v. Raich background.
Laughlin C
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 16083100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Justices say doctors may not be punished for recommending medical marijuana.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A14. PubMed ID: 14610768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Garden State just got greener: New Jersey is the fourteenth state in the nation to legalize medical marijuana.
Brown M
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2011; 41(4):1519-67. PubMed ID: 22368811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "Physicians are not bootleggers": the short, peculiar life of the Medicinal Alcohol Movement.
Appel JM
Bull Hist Med; 2008; 82(2):355-86. PubMed ID: 18622072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Justices set back use of marijuana to treat illness.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2001 May; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 12159858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
