173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16306659)
1. An examination of the number of required apertures for step-and-shoot IMRT.
Jiang Z; Earl MA; Zhang GW; Yu CX; Shepard DM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5653-63. PubMed ID: 16306659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Kim Y; Verhey LJ; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2147-56. PubMed ID: 17404460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A dose verification method using a monitor unit matrix for dynamic IMRT on Varian linear accelerators.
Chen X; Yue NJ; Chen W; Saw CB; Heron DE; Stefanik D; Antemann R; Huq MS
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5641-52. PubMed ID: 16306658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a way to simplify IMRT.
Ludlum E; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):807-21. PubMed ID: 18199916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using total-variation regularization for intensity modulated radiation therapy inverse planning with field-specific numbers of segments.
Zhu L; Lee L; Ma Y; Ye Y; Mazzeo R; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6653-72. PubMed ID: 18997262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a strategy for improving therapeutic gain and reducing the integral dose.
Abate A; Pressello MC; Benassi M; Strigari L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7183-98. PubMed ID: 19920309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Fox C; Romeijn HE; Lynch B; Men C; Aleman DM; Dempsey JF
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 18506074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A difference-matrix metaheuristic for intensity map segmentation in step-and-shoot IMRT delivery.
Gunawardena AD; D'Souza WD; Goadrich LD; Meyer RR; Sorensen KJ; Naqvi SA; Shi L
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2517-36. PubMed ID: 16675867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dynamic and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning and delivery.
Alaei P; Higgins PD; Weaver R; Nguyen N
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15023386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of beamlet step-size on IMRT plan quality.
Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Earl M; Yu C
Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3448-54. PubMed ID: 16370431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flattening filter free beams in SBRT and IMRT: dosimetric assessment of peripheral doses.
Kragl G; Baier F; Lutz S; Albrich D; Dalaryd M; Kroupa B; Wiezorek T; Knöös T; Georg D
Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 20888199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical implementation of dynamic and step-and-shoot IMRT to treat prostate cancer with high risk of pelvic lymph node involvement.
Adams EJ; Convery DJ; Cosgrove VP; McNair HA; Staffurth JN; Vaarkamp J; Nutting CM; Warrington AP; Webb S; Balyckyi J; Dearnaley DP
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jan; 70(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15036846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study on surface dose generated in prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment.
Chow JC; Grigorov GN; Barnett RB
Med Dosim; 2006; 31(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 17134664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct aperture optimization of breast IMRT and the dosimetric impact of respiration motion.
Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Zhang B; Yu C
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):N357-69. PubMed ID: 17019024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison between 2-Step IMRT and conventional IMRT planning.
Bratengeier K; Guckenberger M; Meyer J; Müller G; Pfreundner L; Schwab F; Flentje M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Sep; 84(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 17707937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetry limitations and a dose correction methodology for step-and-shoot IMRT.
Grigorov GN; Chow JC; Barnett RB
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):637-52. PubMed ID: 16424586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct aperture optimization: a turnkey solution for step-and-shoot IMRT.
Shepard DM; Earl MA; Li XA; Naqvi S; Yu C
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1007-18. PubMed ID: 12094970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Step and shoot IMRT to mobile targets and techniques to mitigate the interplay effect.
Ehler ED; Tomé WA
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4311-24. PubMed ID: 19531851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
