These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
511 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16307572)
1. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study. Sammons RL; Lumbikanonda N; Gross M; Cantzler P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 16307572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics. Lumbikanonda N; Sammons R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):627-36. PubMed ID: 11669244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets. Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Sader MS; Balduino A; Soares Gde A; Borojevic R Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):667-75. PubMed ID: 16307573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of titanium surfaces in cultures of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells: an immunohistochemical study. Aybar B; Emes Y; Atalay B; Tanrikulu S; Kaya AS; Işsever H; Ceyhan T; Bilir A Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19212240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model. Abron A; Hopfensperger M; Thompson J; Cooper LF J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11174677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces. Pae A; Kim SS; Kim HS; Woo YH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21691593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model. Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of TiO2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Guo J; Padilla RJ; Ambrose W; De Kok IJ; Cooper LF Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(36):5418-25. PubMed ID: 17868850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on modified titanium surfaces. Lukaszewska-Kuska M; Wirstlein P; Majchrowski R; Dorocka-Bobkowska B Micron; 2018 Feb; 105():55-63. PubMed ID: 29179009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different titanium surfaces modulate the bone phenotype of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. Postiglione L; Di Domenico G; Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Di Meglio F; Montagnani S Eur J Histochem; 2004; 48(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 15590412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces. Le Guehennec L; Lopez-Heredia MA; Enkel B; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P Acta Biomater; 2008 May; 4(3):535-43. PubMed ID: 18226985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Cooper LF; Zhou Y; Takebe J; Guo J; Abron A; Holmén A; Ellingsen JE Biomaterials; 2006 Feb; 27(6):926-36. PubMed ID: 16112191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The influence of the titanium implant surface on the process of osseointegration]. Grössner-Schreiber B; Tuan RS Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Oct; 46(10):691-3. PubMed ID: 1817865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical properties of jaw periosteum-derived mineralized culture on different titanium topography. Att W; Kubo K; Yamada M; Maeda H; Ogawa T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):831-41. PubMed ID: 19865623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]