225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16308902)
1. Assessing clinical performance of gynecology residents: sonographic evaluation of adnexal masses based on morphological scoring systems.
Lee TS; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kang SB; Lee HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 26(7):776-9. PubMed ID: 16308902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.
Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; López-García G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. External validation of the adapted Risk of Malignancy Index incorporating tumor size in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
van den Akker PA; Zusterzeel PL; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Kluivers KB; Massuger LF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):422-5. PubMed ID: 21824712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone.
Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Hugol D; Hassen K; Sciot C; Truc JB; Poitout P; Vadrot D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8553953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Doppler with two-dimensional sonography and CA 125 for prediction of malignancy of pelvic masses.
Schneider VL; Schneider A; Reed KL; Hatch KD
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):983-8. PubMed ID: 8497367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography in adnexal masses: which parameter performs best?
Alcázar JL; Ruiz-Perez ML; Errasti T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 8(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 8883314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound methods to distinguish between malignant and benign adnexal masses in the hands of examiners with different levels of experience.
Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; De Moor B; De Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 19736644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study.
Tian C; Wen SB; Zhao CY; Yan XN; Du JX
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37940895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
Radosa MP; Vorwergk J; Fitzgerald J; Kaehler C; Schneider U; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Schleußner E
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the preoperative classification of adnexal masses as benign or malignant by second-stage tests.
Daemen A; Valentin L; Fruscio R; Van Holsbeke C; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Ombelet W; Rossi A; Vergote I; Bourne T; De Moor B; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 20814878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of a multiparameter, ultrasound-based triage on surgical management of adnexal masses.
Berlanda N; Ferrari MM; Mezzopane R; Boero V; Grijuela B; Ferrazzi E; Pardi G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 20(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 12153670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study.
Ferrazzi E; Zanetta G; Dordoni D; Berlanda N; Mezzopane R; Lissoni AA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 10(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9339526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A scoring system to differentiate malignant from benign masses in specific ultrasound-based subgroups of adnexal tumors.
Ameye L; Valentin L; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Van Huffel S; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 19090501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound experience substantially impacts on diagnostic performance and confidence when adnexal masses are classified using pattern recognition.
Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; Boes AS; Joos A; Van De Vijver A; Roggen N; de Moor B; de Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2010; 69(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 20016188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic morphology scores (SMS) for differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Wanapirak C; Srisupundit K; Tongsong T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(3):407-10. PubMed ID: 17059332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
