225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16308902)
21. Diagnostic performance of the Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignant adnexal masses.
Zhang T; Li F; Liu J; Zhang S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 137(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28295272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic Performance of a Sonographic Volume and Solid Vascular Tissue Score (VSVTS) for Preoperative Risk Assessment of Pediatric and Adolescent Adnexal Masses.
Farràs Roca L; Alshehri ED; Goldberg HR; Amirabadi A; Kives S; Allen L; Navarro OM; Lam CZ
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 34(3):377-382. PubMed ID: 33271292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings.
Jain KA
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8134599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the Risk of Malignancy Index in daily clinical management of adnexal masses.
van den Akker PA; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Kluivers KB; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Massuger LF
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 19959215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Aubert E; Rockall A; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Rouzier R; Daraï E; Bazot M
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):432-43. PubMed ID: 23468574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A new scoring system to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Mercé LT; Laparte C; Jurado M; López-García G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 188(3):685-92. PubMed ID: 12634641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional sonographic morphologic assessment in complex adnexal masses: preliminary experience.
Alcázar JL; Galán MJ; García-Manero M; Guerriero S
J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Mar; 22(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 12636324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differentiation of small adnexal masses based on morphologic characteristics of transvaginal sonographic imaging: a multicenter study.
Ferrazzi E; Lissoni AA; Dordoni D; Trio D; Redaelli L; Rusconi C; Sanpaolo P; Floriani I; Torri V; Zaglio S; Valcamonico A; Piol F; Berlanda N; Zanetta G
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Nov; 24(11):1467-73; quiz 1475-6. PubMed ID: 16239647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Application values of four risk of malignancy indices in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses].
Lou HY; Meng H; Zhu QL; Zhang Q; Jiang YX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Jun; 32(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20602883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: value of a morphologic scoring system.
Topuz S; Saygili H; Akhan S; Yavuz E; Turfanda A; Berkman S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 15857033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Usefulness of color Doppler in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses].
Caruso A; Caforio L; Testa AC; Ciampelli M; Benedetti Panici P; Caruana P; Marana R; Mancuso S
Minerva Ginecol; 1998; 50(7-8):285-90. PubMed ID: 9808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The pre-operative assessment of the adnexal mass: the accuracy of clinical estimates versus clinical prediction rules.
Boll D; Geomini PM; Brölmann HA; Sijmons EA; Heintz PM; Mol BW
BJOG; 2003 May; 110(5):519-23. PubMed ID: 12742339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.
Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Jurkovic D; Neven P; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1706-14. PubMed ID: 18000221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ovarian crescent sign and sonomorphological indices in preoperative determination of malignancy in adnexal masses.
Kalghatgi-Kulkarni K; Kushtagi P
Indian J Med Sci; 2008 Dec; 62(12):477-83. PubMed ID: 19265241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective evaluation of transvaginal sonography for detection of ovarian disease.
DiSantis DJ; Scatarige JC; Kemp G; Given FT; Hsiu JG; Cramer MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 8517330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Association between the sonographer's experience and diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules.
Ning CP; Ji X; Wang HQ; Du XY; Niu HT; Fang SB
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 16(1):179. PubMed ID: 30185198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Asymptomatic adnexal masses: correlation of FDG PET and histopathologic findings.
Fenchel S; Grab D; Nuessle K; Kotzerke J; Rieber A; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Reske SN
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 12034950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.
Sohaib SA; Mills TD; Sahdev A; Webb JA; Vantrappen PO; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
Clin Radiol; 2005 Mar; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15710137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
