164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16309559)
1. Genes involved in complex adaptive processes tend to have highly conserved upstream regions in mammalian genomes.
Lee S; Kohane I; Kasif S
BMC Genomics; 2005 Nov; 6():168. PubMed ID: 16309559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abundance, arrangement, and function of sequence motifs in the chicken promoters.
Abe H; Gemmell NJ
BMC Genomics; 2014 Oct; 15(1):900. PubMed ID: 25318583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Housekeeping genes tend to show reduced upstream sequence conservation.
Farré D; Bellora N; Mularoni L; Messeguer X; Albà MM
Genome Biol; 2007; 8(7):R140. PubMed ID: 17626644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative promoter region analysis powered by CORG.
Dieterich C; Grossmann S; Tanzer A; Röpcke S; Arndt PF; Stadler PF; Vingron M
BMC Genomics; 2005 Feb; 6():24. PubMed ID: 15723697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulatory conservation of protein coding and microRNA genes in vertebrates: lessons from the opossum genome.
Mahony S; Corcoran DL; Feingold E; Benos PV
Genome Biol; 2007; 8(5):R84. PubMed ID: 17506886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Weak correlation between sequence conservation in promoter regions and in protein-coding regions of human-mouse orthologous gene pairs.
Chiba H; Yamashita R; Kinoshita K; Nakai K
BMC Genomics; 2008 Apr; 9():152. PubMed ID: 18384671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction-based approaches to characterize bidirectional promoters in the mammalian genome.
Yang MQ; Elnitski LL
BMC Genomics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. PubMed ID: 18366609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying pattern-defined regulatory islands in mammalian genomes.
Cheung TH; Barthel KK; Kwan YL; Liu X
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jun; 104(24):10116-21. PubMed ID: 17535887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification and cross-species comparison of canine osteoarthritic gene regulatory cis-elements.
Hannenhalli SS; Middleton RP; Levy S; Perroud B; Holzwarth JA; McDonald K; Hannah SS
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2006 Aug; 14(8):830-8. PubMed ID: 16580849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of estrogen-responsive genes using a genome-wide analysis of promoter elements for transcription factor binding sites.
Kamalakaran S; Radhakrishnan SK; Beck WT
J Biol Chem; 2005 Jun; 280(22):21491-7. PubMed ID: 15790569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genome-wide prediction of transcriptional regulatory elements of human promoters using gene expression and promoter analysis data.
Kim SY; Kim Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 7():330. PubMed ID: 16817975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The regulatory code for transcriptional response diversity and its relation to genome structural properties in A. thaliana.
Walther D; Brunnemann R; Selbig J
PLoS Genet; 2007 Feb; 3(2):e11. PubMed ID: 17291162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inherent promoter bidirectionality facilitates maintenance of sequence integrity and transcription of parasitic DNA in mammalian genomes.
Kalitsis P; Saffery R
BMC Genomics; 2009 Oct; 10():498. PubMed ID: 19860919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Positional conservation of clusters of overlapping promoter-like sequences in enterobacterial genomes.
Huerta AM; Collado-Vides J; Francino MP;
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 May; 23(5):997-1010. PubMed ID: 16547149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of human chromosome 21 conserved nongenic sequences (CNGs) with the mouse and dog genomes shows that their selective constraint is independent of their genic environment.
Dermitzakis ET; Kirkness E; Schwarz S; Birney E; Reymond A; Antonarakis SE
Genome Res; 2004 May; 14(5):852-9. PubMed ID: 15078857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extreme restructuring of
Ciren D; Zebell S; Lippman ZB
bioRxiv; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38187729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conservation and evolvability in regulatory networks: the evolution of ribosomal regulation in yeast.
Tanay A; Regev A; Shamir R
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 May; 102(20):7203-8. PubMed ID: 15883364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CompMoby: comparative MobyDick for detection of cis-regulatory motifs.
Chaivorapol C; Melton C; Wei G; Yeh RF; Ramalho-Santos M; Blelloch R; Li H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():455. PubMed ID: 18950538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genome-wide DNA methylome variation in two genetically distinct chicken lines using MethylC-seq.
Li J; Li R; Wang Y; Hu X; Zhao Y; Li L; Feng C; Gu X; Liang F; Lamont SJ; Hu S; Zhou H; Li N
BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():851. PubMed ID: 26497311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computational approaches to identify promoters and cis-regulatory elements in plant genomes.
Rombauts S; Florquin K; Lescot M; Marchal K; Rouzé P; van de Peer Y
Plant Physiol; 2003 Jul; 132(3):1162-76. PubMed ID: 12857799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
