344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16309878)
21. Reconstituted human corneal epithelium: a new alternative to the Draize eye test for the assessment of the eye irritation potential of chemicals and cosmetic products.
Doucet O; Lanvin M; Thillou C; Linossier C; Pupat C; Merlin B; Zastrow L
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):499-512. PubMed ID: 16243479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative evaluation to predict the eye irritancy of chemicals: Modification of chorioallantoic membrane test by using trypan blue.
Hagino S; Itagaki H; Kato S; Kobayashi T; Tanaka M
Toxicol In Vitro; 1991; 5(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 20732030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. HET-CAM test for determining the possible eye irritancy of pesticides.
Budai P; Lehel J; Tavaszi J; Kormos E
Acta Vet Hung; 2010 Sep; 58(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 20713327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Study on the use of haemoglobin denaturation test as an alternative to Draize eye irritation test].
Liao Y; Wang X; Zhang LS; Li GM; Zhang BX
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Sep; 35(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 15460411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining several alternatives for identification of eye irritation potential of chemicals including insoluble or volatile substances.
Hayashi K; Mori T; Abo T; Ooshima K; Hayashi T; Komano T; Takahashi Y; Sakaguchi H; Takatsu A; Nishiyama N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Oct; 26(7):1199-208. PubMed ID: 22743076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A new cell-based method for assessing the eye irritation potential of chemicals: an alternative to the Draize test.
Cho SA; An S; Lee E; Shin K; Cho JC; Lee TR
Toxicol Lett; 2012 Jul; 212(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 22595615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ocular toxicology: the Draize eye test.
Secchi A; Deligianni V
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol; 2006 Oct; 6(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 16954791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of the red blood cell test system as in vitro assay for the rapid screening of irritation potential of surfactants.
Pape WJ; Pfannenbecker U; Hoppe U
Mol Toxicol; 1987-1988 Fall; 1(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 3509700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Categorical evaluation of the ocular irritancy of cosmetic and consumer products by human ocular instillation procedures.
Gao Y; Kanengiser BE
J Cosmet Sci; 2004; 55(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 15386023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Human hemoglobin denaturation as an alternative to the Draize test for predicting eye irritancy of surfactants.
Mitjans M; Infante MR; Vinardell MP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 52(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 18602964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation project of alternatives for the Draize eye test.
Kalweit S; Gerner I; Spielmann H
Mol Toxicol; 1987-1988 Fall; 1(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 3509706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Draize test and alternative methods for evaluating irritation from chemical substances].
Moskalewski S; Mystkowska ET; Kiss E
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1995; 46(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 8533034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: eye irritation.
McNamee P; Hibatallah J; Costabel-Farkas M; Goebel C; Araki D; Dufour E; Hewitt NJ; Jones P; Kirst A; Le Varlet B; Macfarlane M; Marrec-Fairley M; Rowland J; Schellauf F; Scheel J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 54(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 19393279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD).
Barroso J; Pfannenbecker U; Adriaens E; Alépée N; Cluzel M; De Smedt A; Hibatallah J; Klaric M; Mewes KR; Millet M; Templier M; McNamee P
Arch Toxicol; 2017 Feb; 91(2):521-547. PubMed ID: 26997338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Irritative effects of some pesticides and a technical component on tissue structure of the chorioallantoic membrane.
Budai P; Várnagy L; Fejes S; Somlyay IM; Linczmayer K; Pongrácz A
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2004; 69(4):807-9. PubMed ID: 15756873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Refinement of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test as an alternative screening test for eye irritation.
Adriaens E; Dhondt MM; Remon JP
Toxicol In Vitro; 2005 Feb; 19(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 15582359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Successful prevalidation of the slug mucosal irritation test to assess the eye irritation potency of chemicals.
Adriaens E; Bytheway H; De Wever B; Eschrich D; Guest R; Hansen E; Vanparys P; Schoeters G; Warren N; Weltens R; Whittingham A; Remon JP
Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Aug; 22(5):1285-96. PubMed ID: 18406103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Cytotoxicity of chemicals used in household products: estimation of eye irritating potency of 25 chemicals tested during 1991-1996].
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 1997; (115):130-4. PubMed ID: 9641827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Alternative methods: Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane and in vitro cytotoxicity - a complementary approach.
Boue-Grabot M; Bernardin G; Chaumond S; Pinon JF
Int J Cosmet Sci; 1995 Oct; 17(5):207-15. PubMed ID: 19245480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Toxicologic screening of some surfactants using modern in vivo bioassays.
Ardelean S; Feflea S; Ionescu D; Năstase V; Dehelean CA
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2011; 115(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 21682193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
