These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16310155)

  • 21. Still clever after all these years: searching for the homunculus in explicitly cued task switching.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):978-94. PubMed ID: 17683241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Task switching in mild cognitive impairment: switch and nonswitch costs.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Sanders C
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Jan; 15(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 19128533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
    Monsell S; Mizon GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming.
    Mayr S; Buchner A; Dentale S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):408-23. PubMed ID: 19331497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
    Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of arousal increase in predictable and random task switching: evidence for the involvement of the anterior attentional network in random but not in predictable task switching.
    Solano Galvis CA; Tornay Mejías F; Gómez Milán E
    Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 21044501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
    Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: no evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration.
    Hübner M; Kluwe RH; Luna-Rodriguez A; Peters A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1043-63. PubMed ID: 15584814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Component processes in task switching.
    Meiran N; Chorev Z; Sapir A
    Cogn Psychol; 2000 Nov; 41(3):211-53. PubMed ID: 11032657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty.
    Arbuthnott KD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Jun; 62(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 18572986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm.
    Rubin O; Meiran N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1477-91. PubMed ID: 16393058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using advance information in dynamic cognitive control: an ERP study of task-switching.
    Swainson R; Jackson SR; Jackson GM
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 16626653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distinguishing between inhibitory and episodic processing accounts of switch-cost asymmetries.
    Wong J; Leboe JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):8-23. PubMed ID: 19271811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. No evidence for a late locus of task switch effects.
    Fiedler A; Schröter H; Ulrich R
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():74-80. PubMed ID: 19100725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The costs of crossing paths and switching tasks between audition and vision.
    Murray MM; De Santis L; Thut G; Wylie GR
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Feb; 69(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 18571299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of task preparation in task switching as reflected on lateralized readiness potential.
    Hsieh S; Chen P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 17027109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.