205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16310992)
1. Are chitosan formulations mucoadhesive in the human small intestine? An evaluation based on gamma scintigraphy.
Säkkinen M; Marvola J; Kanerva H; Lindevall K; Ahonen A; Marvola M
Int J Pharm; 2006 Jan; 307(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 16310992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of microcrystalline chitosans for gastro-retentive drug delivery.
Säkkinen M; Tuononen T; Jürjenson H; Veski P; Marvola M
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2003 Aug; 19(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 12907285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo assessment of novel furosemide gastro-mucoadhesive delivery system based on a kind of anion ion-exchange fiber.
Yao H; Wang S; Sun Y; Liu H; Li S
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2009 May; 35(5):548-54. PubMed ID: 18946794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gamma scintigraphic evaluation of the fate of microcrystalline chitosan granules in human stomach.
Säkkinen M; Marvola J; Kanerva H; Lindevall K; Lipponen M; Kekki T; Ahonen A; Marvola M
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2004 Jan; 57(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 14729089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Design and in vitro and in vivo characterization of mucoadhesive matrix pellets of metformin hydrochloride for oral controlled release: a technical note.
Ige PP; Gattani SG
Arch Pharm Res; 2012 Mar; 35(3):487-98. PubMed ID: 22477196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colonic delivery of metronidazole-loaded capsules for local treatment of bacterial infections: A clinical pharmacoscintigraphy study.
Preisig D; Varum F; Bravo R; Hartig C; Spleiss J; Abbes S; Caobelli F; Wild D; Puchkov M; Huwyler J; Haschke M
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2021 Aug; 165():22-30. PubMed ID: 33971274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo evaluation of matrix granules containing microcrystalline chitosan as a gel-forming excipient.
Säkkinen M; Linna A; Ojala S; Jürjenson H; Veski P; Marvola M
Int J Pharm; 2003 Jan; 250(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 12480288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mucoadhesive microspheres for gastroretentive delivery of acyclovir: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Dhaliwal S; Jain S; Singh HP; Tiwary AK
AAPS J; 2008 Jun; 10(2):322-30. PubMed ID: 18523891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of oral mucoadhesive microspheres in man on the basis of the pharmacokinetics of furosemide and riboflavin, compounds with limited gastrointestinal absorption sites.
Akiyama Y; Nagahara N; Nara E; Kitano M; Iwasa S; Yamamoto I; Azuma J; Ogawa Y
J Pharm Pharmacol; 1998 Feb; 50(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 9530983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In Vivo Evaluation of a Novel Chitosan-Polycaprolactone Based Mucoadhesive Gastro-Retentive Sustained Release Drug Delivery System for Milnacipran HCl.
Hussain T; Ijaz M; Shamim R; Hussain K; Abbas N; Hussain A; Griessinger JA; Bukhari NI
AAPS PharmSciTech; 2020 Jan; 21(2):58. PubMed ID: 31912249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel method to radiolabel gastric retentive formulations for gamma scintigraphy assessment.
Burke MD; Staton JS; Vickers AW; Peters EE; Coffin MD
Pharm Res; 2007 Apr; 24(4):695-704. PubMed ID: 17372696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and characterization of gastroretentive sustained-release formulation by combination of swelling and mucoadhesive approach: a mechanistic study.
Sankar R; Jain SK
Drug Des Devel Ther; 2013; 7():1455-69. PubMed ID: 24348022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preparation, characterization and evaluation of ranitidine hydrochloride-loaded mucoadhesive microspheres.
Dhankar V; Garg G; Dhamija K; Awasthi R
Polim Med; 2014; 44(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 24967779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of polyethylene glycol 400 on gastrointestinal transit: implications for the formulation of poorly-water soluble drugs.
Basit AW; Newton JM; Short MD; Waddington WA; Ell PJ; Lacey LF
Pharm Res; 2001 Aug; 18(8):1146-50. PubMed ID: 11587486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of formulation technology to assess regional gastrointestinal drug absorption in humans.
Basit AW; Podczeck F; Newton JM; Waddington WA; Ell PJ; Lacey LF
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2004 Feb; 21(2-3):179-89. PubMed ID: 14757489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distribution of thiolated mucoadhesive nanoparticles on intestinal mucosa.
Dünnhaupt S; Barthelmes J; Hombach J; Sakloetsakun D; Arkhipova V; Bernkop-Schnürch A
Int J Pharm; 2011 Apr; 408(1-2):191-9. PubMed ID: 21295123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scintigraphic verification of adherence of a chitosan formulation to the human oesophagus.
Säkkinen M; Marvola J; Kanerva H; Lindevall K; Ahonen A; Marvola M
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2004 Jan; 57(1):145-7. PubMed ID: 14729090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive glipizide films.
Rajput G; Majmudar F; Patel J
Acta Pharm; 2011 Jun; 61(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 21684847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of mucoadhesive polymeric nanoparticulate systems on oral bioavailability of a macromolecular model drug.
Fabiano A; Piras AM; Uccello-Barretta G; Balzano F; Cesari A; Testai L; Citi V; Zambito Y
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2018 Sep; 130():281-289. PubMed ID: 30006244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polymeric nanofibers: targeted gastro-retentive drug delivery systems.
Malik R; Garg T; Goyal AK; Rath G
J Drug Target; 2015 Feb; 23(2):109-24. PubMed ID: 25268275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
