These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16311434)

  • 1. Evaluation of femur angle abduction/adduction and bone mineral density values.
    Wong JC; Ong B
    J Clin Densitom; 2005; 8(4):472-5. PubMed ID: 16311434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Slight abduction/adduction deviations in femur positioning for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry are inconsequential.
    Ozer BH; Krueger D; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 19942467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of femoral rotation on bone mineral density measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Goh JC; Low SL; Bose K
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Nov; 57(5):340-3. PubMed ID: 8564796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of femoral rotation on hip bone mineral density measurement].
    Tang H; Ren SM; Luo XZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 25(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 12905737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of a new positioner on the precision of hip bone mineral density measurements.
    Hans D; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Horn S; Avioli LV; Drezner MK; Meunier PJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Aug; 12(8):1289-94. PubMed ID: 9258760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of patient positioning on measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur: a simulation study using computed tomographic images.
    Uemura K; Takao M; Otake Y; Takashima K; Hamada H; Ando W; Sato Y; Sugano N
    Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Feb; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 36826629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans.
    Faulkner KG; Genant HK; McClung M
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Jan; 56(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 7796342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of the diagnostic value of bilateral femoral neck bone mineral density measurements.
    Petley GW; Taylor PA; Murrills AJ; Dennison E; Pearson G; Cooper C
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(8):675-9. PubMed ID: 11095170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan-beam.
    Mazess RB; Hanson JA; Payne R; Nord R; Wilson M
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 10793875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of subtle positioning flaws on measured bone mineral density of the hip.
    McKiernan F; Washington W
    J Clin Densitom; 2005; 8(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 16055964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of hip rotation on bone mineral density of the proximal femur measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Celik O; Salci Y; Manisali M; Korkusuz F
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2009; 20(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 19619109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women.
    Gnudi S; Ripamonti C; Gualtieri G; Malavolta N
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Aug; 72(860):729-33. PubMed ID: 10624337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilateral femoral bone mineral density measurements in Chinese women and men.
    Xu H; Gong J; Chen JX; Zhang TM; Wu QL
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 17485033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Handedness and bilateral femoral bone densities in men and women.
    Gümüştekin K; Akar S; Dane S; Yildirim M; Seven B; Varoglu E
    Int J Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 114(12):1533-47. PubMed ID: 15512837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [X-ray densitometry and ultrasonography of the heel bone--sensitivity and comparison with densitometry of the axial skeleton].
    Michalská D; Zikán V; Stĕpán J; Weichetová M; Kubová V; Krenková J; Masatová A
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2000 Apr; 139(8):231-6. PubMed ID: 10916211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence.
    Binkley N; Kiebzak GM; Lewiecki EM; Krueger D; Gangnon RE; Miller PD; Shepherd JA; Drezner MK
    J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Feb; 20(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 15647812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of femoral neck strength by 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry.
    Le Bras A; Kolta S; Soubrane P; Skalli W; Roux C; Mitton D
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 17097528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Positioning of the Region of Interest on Bone Density of the Hip.
    Feit A; Levin N; McNamara EA; Sinha P; Whittaker LG; Malabanan AO; Rosen HN
    J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(3):426-431. PubMed ID: 31036446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of positioning on dual energy X-ray bone densitometry of the proximal femur.
    Wilson CR; Fogelman I; Blake GM; Rodin A
    Bone Miner; 1991 Apr; 13(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 2065219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An early-life femoral shaft fracture and bone mineral density at adulthood.
    Leppälä J; Kannus P; Niemi S; Sievänen H; Vuori I; Järvinen M
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 10692985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.