These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16311880)

  • 1. Gambling screens: does shortening the time frame affect their psychometric properties?
    Wulfert E; Hartley J; Lee M; Wang N; Franco C; Sodano R
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(4):521-36. PubMed ID: 16311880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric evaluation of the National Opinion Research Center DSM-IV Screen for Gambling Problems (NODS).
    Wickwire EM; Burke RS; Brown SA; Parker JD; May RK
    Am J Addict; 2008; 17(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 18770081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
    Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the NORC DSM Screen for Gambling Problems as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: psychometric evaluation.
    Hodgins DC
    Addict Behav; 2004 Nov; 29(8):1685-90. PubMed ID: 15451138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students.
    Weinstock J; Whelan JP; Meyers AW; McCausland C
    Assessment; 2007 Dec; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 17986657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of the pathological gambling adaptation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS).
    Pallanti S; DeCaria CM; Grant JE; Urpe M; Hollander E
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 16311876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons between the South Oaks Gambling Screen and a DSM-IV-based interview in a community survey of problem gambling.
    Cox BJ; Enns MW; Michaud V
    Can J Psychiatry; 2004 Apr; 49(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 15147024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Problem and probable pathological gambling among older adults assessed by the SOGS-R.
    Wiebe JM; Cox BJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 15870987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling.
    Stinchfield R
    Am J Psychiatry; 2003 Jan; 160(1):180-2. PubMed ID: 12505822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of the psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of DSM-IV-MR-J and SOGS-RA.
    Skokauskas N; Burba B; Freedman D
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19241149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
    de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrent and predictive validity of the Addiction Severity Index in pathological gamblers.
    Petry NM
    Am J Addict; 2007; 16(4):272-82. PubMed ID: 17661195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the South Oaks Gambling Screen with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria: results from a diverse community sample of gamblers.
    Goodie AS; MacKillop J; Miller JD; Fortune EE; Maples J; Lance CE; Campbell WK
    Assessment; 2013 Oct; 20(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 23946283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
    Stinchfield R
    Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subtyping study of a pathological gamblers sample.
    Alvarez-Moya EM; Jiménez-Murcia S; Aymamí MN; Gómez-Peña M; Granero R; Santamaría J; Menchón JM; Fernández-Aranda F
    Can J Psychiatry; 2010 Aug; 55(8):498-506. PubMed ID: 20723277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.
    Lesieur HR; Blume SB
    Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Sep; 144(9):1184-8. PubMed ID: 3631315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SOGS and CGPI: parallel comparison on a diverse population.
    Young M; Stevens M
    J Gambl Stud; 2008 Sep; 24(3):337-56. PubMed ID: 18327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The South Oaks Gambling Screen: a review with reference to Australian use.
    Battersby MW; Thomas LJ; Tolchard B; Esterman A
    J Gambl Stud; 2002; 18(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12375383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Presence of problematic and disordered gambling in older age and validation of the South Oaks Gambling Scale.
    Granero R; Jiménez-Murcia S; Fernández-Aranda F; Del Pino-Gutiérrez A; Mena-Moreno T; Mestre-Bach G; Gómez-Peña M; Moragas L; Aymamí N; Giroux I; Grall-Bronnec M; Sauvaget A; Codina E; Vintró-Alcaraz C; Lozano-Madrid M; Camozzi M; Agüera Z; Sánchez-González J; Casalé-Salayet G; Sánchez I; López-González H; Valenciano-Mendoza E; Mora B; Baenas I; Menchón JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233222. PubMed ID: 32428026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric evaluation of the NORC diagnostic screen for gambling problems (NODS) for the assessment of DSM-5 gambling disorder.
    Brazeau BW; Hodgins DC
    Addict Behav; 2022 Jul; 130():107310. PubMed ID: 35325637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.