These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16313048)

  • 1. [Prognostic significance of Bishop's pelvic score for the continuity and the final outlet of induction of labor].
    Nashar S; Dimitrov A; Nikolov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(5):13-8. PubMed ID: 16313048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Assessment of Bishop's pelvic score in induction of labor prognosis].
    Nashar S; Dimitrov A; Nikolov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2006; 45(2):10-6. PubMed ID: 16637296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The significance of maternal factors for predicting of induced labor outcome].
    Nashar S; Dimitrov A; Nikolov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(6):3-8. PubMed ID: 18985870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified Bishop's score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery.
    Bujold E; Blackwell SC; Hendler I; Berman S; Sorokin Y; Gauthier RJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1644-8. PubMed ID: 15547536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Significance of fetal factors in prognosis of outcome after labor induction].
    Nashar S; Dimitrov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43(3):11-7. PubMed ID: 15341250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simplified Bishop score including parity predicts successful induction of labor.
    Ivars J; Garabedian C; Devos P; Therby D; Carlier S; Deruelle P; Subtil D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():309-14. PubMed ID: 27423032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Currently used oxytocin regimen outcome measures at term & postterm. II: Outcome indicators in relation to Bishop Score & other covariates.
    Berhan Y; Dwivedi AD
    Ethiop Med J; 2007 Jul; 45(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 18330324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Prediction of successful induction of labor: a comparison between fetal fibronectin assay and the Bishop score].
    Droulez A; Girard R; Dumas AM; Mathian B; Berland M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Nov; 37(7):691-6. PubMed ID: 18602765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Ennen CS; Bofill JA; Magann EF; Bass JD; Chauhan SP; Morrison JC
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 67(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 18971583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transvaginal measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labour.
    Maitra N; Sharma D; Agarwal S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jul; 29(5):388-91. PubMed ID: 19603314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of the predictive value of digital examination (Bishop's score) and ultrasound evaluation for labor induction success].
    Sieroszewski P; Banach R
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Feb; 81(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 20232707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
    Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective use of sonographic cervical length measurement for predicting imminent preterm delivery in women with preterm labor and intact membranes.
    Schmitz T; Kayem G; Maillard F; Lebret MT; Cabrol D; Goffinet F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 31(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 18383461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining cervical ripeness and labor outcome: the efficacy of magnetic resonance T2 relaxation times.
    Pates JA; Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; Babcock EE; McIntire DD; Twickler DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):326-30. PubMed ID: 17267832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor.
    Peregrine E; O'Brien P; Omar R; Jauniaux E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):227-33. PubMed ID: 16449105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Misoprostol and induction of labour].
    Porozhanova V; Sampat D; Porozhanova K
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(5):27-30. PubMed ID: 16313050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Induction of labor. Case material of 1000 patients evaluated by the Bishop pelvic score].
    Oian P; Abyholm T; Moe N
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1983 Nov; 103(31):2099-101. PubMed ID: 6658732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Premature rupture of the amniotic sac with a term fetus and low pelvic score--its management].
    Lazarov L
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1994; 33(3):3-4. PubMed ID: 7793523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
    Zeteroglu S; Sahin GH; Sahin HA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.