These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1631321)

  • 1. On the relation between visual spatial attention and visual field asymmetries.
    Mondor TA; Bryden MP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Apr; 44(3):529-55. PubMed ID: 1631321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition.
    Nicholls ME; Wood AG
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deployment of spatial attention to words in central and peripheral vision.
    Ducrot S; Grainger J
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 May; 69(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 17727111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual field asymmetries and allocation of attention in visual scenes.
    Rhodes DL; Robertson LC
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Oct; 50(1):95-115. PubMed ID: 12372355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional deployment in visual half-field tasks: the effect of cue position on word naming latency.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME
    Brain Cogn; 2003 Nov; 53(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 14607163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention in schizophrenia.
    Maruff P; Hay D; Malone V; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1995 Oct; 33(10):1205-23. PubMed ID: 8552225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention to spatial and non-spatial cues in Alzheimer's disease.
    Maruff P; Malone V; Currie J
    Brain; 1995 Dec; 118 ( Pt 6)():1421-35. PubMed ID: 8595474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hand-hemispace spatial compatibility, precueing, and stimulus-onset asynchrony.
    Bradshaw JL; Willmott CJ; Umiltà C; Phillips JG; Bradshaw JA; Mattingley JB
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 8008779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lateral asymmetries in attentional priming during a semantic and a visuospatial task.
    Declerck C; De Brabander B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Jun; 92(3 Pt 1):623-32. PubMed ID: 11453184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consciousness wanted, attention found: Reasons for the advantage of the left visual field in identifying T2 among rapidly presented series.
    Verleger R; Śmigasiewicz K
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():260-73. PubMed ID: 25777355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional factors in visual field asymmetries.
    Bryden MP; Mondor TA
    Can J Psychol; 1991 Dec; 45(4):427-47. PubMed ID: 1777848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional weighting: a possible account of visual field asymmetries in visual search?
    Rezec AA; Dobkins KR
    Spat Vis; 2004; 17(4-5):269-93. PubMed ID: 15559106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Left-right and upper-lower visual field asymmetries for face matching, letter naming, and lexical decision.
    Hagenbeek RE; Van Strien JW
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 12027390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in visuospatial attention over the adult lifespan.
    Greenwood PM; Parasuraman R; Haxby JV
    Neuropsychologia; 1993 May; 31(5):471-85. PubMed ID: 8502379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual organization at attended and unattended locations.
    Han S; Humphreys GW
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2005 Apr; 48(2):106-16. PubMed ID: 15986883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits.
    Poynter W; Ingram P; Minor S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19931966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The non-contribution of attentional biases to visual field asymmetries for temporal discrimination.
    Nicholls ME
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Feb; 32(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 8190244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.