These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1631486)

  • 1. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors.
    Bakke M; Tuxen A; Vilmann P; Jensen BR; Vilmann A; Toft M
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Jun; 100(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 1631486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variables related to masseter muscle function: a maximum R2 improvement analysis.
    Bakke M; Stoltze K; Tuxen A
    Scand J Dent Res; 1993 Jun; 101(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 8322010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporalis and masseter muscle activity in patients with anterior open bite and craniomandibular disorders.
    Bakke M; Michler L
    Scand J Dent Res; 1991 Jun; 99(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 1871532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Facial morphology and the size and activity of the masseter muscle].
    Ruf S; Pancherz H; Kirschbaum M
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1994 Oct; 55(5):219-27. PubMed ID: 7995603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children.
    Charalampidou M; Kjellberg H; Georgiakaki I; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18320415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics.
    Hannam AG; Wood WW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Dec; 80(4):429-45. PubMed ID: 2603948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.
    Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Shigeeda T; Shinohara A; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Shimizu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 21262936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masseter thickness, endurance and exercise-induced pain in subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
    Farella M; Bakke M; Michelotti A; Rapuano A; Martina R
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2003 Jun; 111(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 12786947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masseter muscle thickness in different skeletal morphology: an ultrasonographic study.
    Rani S; Ravi MS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 20930353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationships between craniofacial morphology and masticatory muscle activity during isometric contraction at different interocclusal distances.
    Takeuchi-Sato T; Arima T; Mew M; Svensson P
    Arch Oral Biol; 2019 Feb; 98():52-60. PubMed ID: 30448395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Muscle thickness, bite force, and craniofacial dimensions in adolescents with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.
    Pereira LJ; Gavião MB; Bonjardim LR; Castelo PM; van der Bilt A
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 17290018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure.
    Hidaka O; Iwasaki M; Saito M; Morimoto T
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1336-44. PubMed ID: 10403461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude.
    Raadsheer MC; van Eijden TM; van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jan; 78(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 10065943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Small vertical changes in jaw relation affect motor unit recruitment in the masseter.
    Terebesi S; Giannakopoulos NN; Brüstle F; Hellmann D; Türp JC; Schindler HJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 43(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 26707515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masticatory muscle thickness, bite force, and occlusal contacts in young children with unilateral posterior crossbite.
    Castelo PM; Gavião MB; Pereira LJ; Bonjardim LR
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 17317862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and its relation to facial morphology.
    Kiliaridis S; Kälebo P
    J Dent Res; 1991 Sep; 70(9):1262-5. PubMed ID: 1918575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occlusal development and masseter activity in Alpacas (Lama pacos).
    Williams SH; Sidote J; Stover KK
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2010 Jan; 293(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 19899120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Masseter thickness measured by ultrasonography of 50 young healthy adults in relation to facial morphology].
    Zhao JZ; Dai Q; Lai QS
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Feb; 23(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 12905821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative data from young men and women on masseter muscle fibres, function and facial morphology.
    Tuxen A; Bakke M; Pinholt EM
    Arch Oral Biol; 1999 Jun; 44(6):509-18. PubMed ID: 10401529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mastication, EMG activity and occlusal contact area in subjects with different facial types.
    Gomes SG; Custodio W; Jufer JS; Del Bel CA; Garcia RC
    Cranio; 2010 Oct; 28(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 21032982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.