These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16316286)

  • 1. How does attention select and track spatially extended objects? New effects of attentional concentration and amplification.
    Alvarez GA; Scholl BJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Nov; 134(4):461-76. PubMed ID: 16316286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The distribution of attention within objects in multiple-object scenes: prioritization by spatial probabilities and a center bias.
    Feria CS
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1185-96. PubMed ID: 18927002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional resources in visual tracking through occlusion: the high-beams effect.
    Flombaum JI; Scholl BJ; Pylyshyn ZW
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):904-31. PubMed ID: 18289519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism.
    Alvarez GA; Franconeri SL
    J Vis; 2007 Oct; 7(13):14.1-10. PubMed ID: 17997642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not by speed, time, or capacity.
    Franconeri SL; Jonathan SV; Scimeca JM
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jul; 21(7):920-5. PubMed ID: 20534781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space.
    Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crossmodal object-based attention: auditory objects affect visual processing.
    Turatto M; Mazza V; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2005 Jun; 96(2):B55-64. PubMed ID: 15925569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatially mediated capacity limits in attentive visual perception.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR; Kramer AF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Oct; 126(2):98-119. PubMed ID: 17196153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional selection of moving objects by a serial process.
    d'Avossa G; Shulman GL; Snyder AZ; Corbetta M
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3403-12. PubMed ID: 16857234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of visuospatial attentional load on the processing of irrelevant acoustic distractors.
    Zhang P; Chen X; Yuan P; Zhang D; He S
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):715-24. PubMed ID: 16956775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the relationship between flanker interference and localized attentional interference.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18155179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Altered vision near the hands.
    Abrams RA; Davoli CC; Du F; Knapp WH; Paull D
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1035-47. PubMed ID: 17977524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do multielement visual tracking and visual search draw continuously on the same visual attention resources?
    Alvarez GA; Horowitz TS; Arsenio HC; Dimase JS; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):643-67. PubMed ID: 16131240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objects on a collision path with the observer demand attention.
    Lin JY; Franconeri S; Enns JT
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jul; 19(7):686-92. PubMed ID: 18727784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The capacity of attention and simultaneous perception of objects: a group study of Huntington's disease patients.
    Finke K; Schneider WX; Redel P; Dose M; Kerkhoff G; Müller HJ; Bublak P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3272-84. PubMed ID: 17681560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tracking the changing features of multiple objects: progressively poorer perceptual precision and progressively greater perceptual lag.
    Howard CJ; Holcombe AO
    Vision Res; 2008 Apr; 48(9):1164-80. PubMed ID: 18359501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.
    Wühr P; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 18248132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.