172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16317200)
1. Junking good science: undoing Daubert v Merrill Dow through cross-examination and argument.
Givelber D; Strickler L
Am J Public Health; 2006 Jan; 96(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 16317200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Law's knowledge: science for justice in legal settings.
Jasanoff S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S49-58. PubMed ID: 16030338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
Berger MA
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How tobacco-friendly science escapes scrutiny in the courtroom.
Friedman LC; Daynard RA; Banthin CN
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S16-20. PubMed ID: 16030332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science.
Haack S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S66-73. PubMed ID: 16030341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law.
Krimsky S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S129-36. PubMed ID: 16030328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
Cranor C
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The perils of relying on interested parties to evaluate scientific quality.
Wagner W
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S99-106. PubMed ID: 16030346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cognitive scientist looks at Daubert.
Lakoff GP
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S114-20. PubMed ID: 16030326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.
Cecil JS
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S74-80. PubMed ID: 16030342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Epistemology in the courtroom: a little "knowledge" is a dangerous thing.
Ozonoff D
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S13-5. PubMed ID: 16030329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulatory parallels to Daubert: stakeholder influence, "sound science," and the delayed adoption of health-protective standards.
Neff RA; Goldman LR
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S81-91. PubMed ID: 16030344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.
Melnick RL
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 16030335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform.
Neufeld PJ
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S107-13. PubMed ID: 16030325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Daubert and the proper role for the courts in health, safety, and environmental regulation.
McGarity TO
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S92-8. PubMed ID: 16030345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Daubert's menace.
Gori GB
Am J Public Health; 2006 Feb; 96(2):206; discussion 206-7. PubMed ID: 16380556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
Faigman DL; Monahan J
Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Science and regulation: current impasse and future solutions.
Hoppin PJ; Clapp R
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S8-S12. PubMed ID: 16030343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific evidence and public policy.
Michaels D
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S5-7. PubMed ID: 16030339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific Evidence and Public Policy. Proceedings of a conference, 2003, Coronado, California, USA.
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S5-150. PubMed ID: 16178071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
