1038 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16317238)
1. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
Wei XF; Grill WM
J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Matching geometry and stimulation parameters of electrodes for deep brain stimulation experiments--numerical considerations.
Gimsa U; Schreiber U; Habel B; Flehr J; van Rienen U; Gimsa J
J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jan; 150(2):212-27. PubMed ID: 16095718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of electrode design on the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation.
Butson CR; McIntyre CC
J Neural Eng; 2006 Mar; 3(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 16510937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic current density of the disk electrode double-layer.
Behrend MR; Ahuja AK; Weiland JD
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1056-62. PubMed ID: 18334397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the implanted pulse generator as reference electrode in finite element model of monopolar deep brain stimulation.
Walckiers G; Fuchs B; Thiran JP; Mosig JR; Pollo C
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Jan; 186(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 19895845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choosing electrodes for deep brain stimulation experiments--electrochemical considerations.
Gimsa J; Habel B; Schreiber U; van Rienen U; Strauss U; Gimsa U
J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Mar; 142(2):251-65. PubMed ID: 15698665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design, simulation and experimental validation of a novel flexible neural probe for deep brain stimulation and multichannel recording.
Lai HY; Liao LD; Lin CT; Hsu JH; He X; Chen YY; Chang JY; Chen HF; Tsang S; Shih YY
J Neural Eng; 2012 Jun; 9(3):036001. PubMed ID: 22488106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.
Datta A; Elwassif M; Battaglia F; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2008 Jun; 5(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 18441418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electric field distribution in a finite-volume head model of deep brain stimulation.
Grant PF; Lowery MM
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Nov; 31(9):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19656716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microelectrode array for chronic deep-brain microstimulation and recording.
McCreery D; Lossinsky A; Pikov V; Liu X
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):726-37. PubMed ID: 16602580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the field distribution in deep brain stimulation: the influence of anisotropy of brain tissue.
Schmidt C; van Rienen U
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jun; 59(6):1583-92. PubMed ID: 22410323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite-element modeling of needle electrodes in tissue from the perspective of frequent model computation.
Sel D; Mazeres S; Teissie J; Miklavcic D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Nov; 50(11):1221-32. PubMed ID: 14619992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of electrode impedance and stimulation efficacy of a chronic cortical implant using novel annulus electrodes in rat motor cortex.
Wang C; Brunton E; Haghgooie S; Cassells K; Lowery A; Rajan R
J Neural Eng; 2013 Aug; 10(4):046010. PubMed ID: 23819958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel electrode array for diameter-dependent control of axonal excitability: a simulation study.
Lertmanorat Z; Durand DM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1242-50. PubMed ID: 15248540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling parkinsonian circuitry and the DBS electrode. II. Evaluation of a computer simulation model of the basal ganglia with and without subthalamic nucleus stimulation.
Shils JL; Mei LZ; Arle JE
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2008; 86(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 17881885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DBS-relevant electric fields increase hydraulic conductivity of in vitro endothelial monolayers.
Lopez-Quintero SV; Datta A; Amaya R; Elwassif M; Bikson M; Tarbell JM
J Neural Eng; 2010 Feb; 7(1):16005. PubMed ID: 20075507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling parkinsonian circuitry and the DBS electrode. I. Biophysical background and software.
Arle JE; Mei LZ; Shils JL
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2008; 86(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 17881884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation with deep brain stimulation instruments.
Shimojima Y; Morita H; Nishikawa N; Kodaira M; Hashimoto T; Ikeda S
Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2010 Feb; 16(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 19811944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single electrode and multiple electrode guided electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease.
Temel Y; Wilbrink P; Duits A; Boon P; Tromp S; Ackermans L; van Kranen-Mastenbroek V; Weber W; Visser-Vandewalle V
Neurosurgery; 2007 Nov; 61(5 Suppl 2):346-55; discussion 355-7. PubMed ID: 18091250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
