169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16317840)
1. The evolution of standards for experimental treatment or research.
Slovenko R
J Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):129-74. PubMed ID: 16317840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond Nazi War Crimes Experiments: The Voluntary Consent Requirement of the Nuremberg Code at 70.
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 2018 Jan; 108(1):42-46. PubMed ID: 29161060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subjects or objects? Prisoners and human experimentation.
Lerner BH
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):1806-7. PubMed ID: 17476006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Are research ethics bad for our mental health?
Michels R
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1427-30. PubMed ID: 10228197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulating research involving adults who lack decision making capacity.
Fleischman AR
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2001; 64(2):12-7. PubMed ID: 12517081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. More subject and less human: the pain-filled journey of human subjects protection ... and some differences in the United States and the European Union.
Gillon JJ
Med Law Int; 2005; 7(1):65-89. PubMed ID: 16622987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Divergent standards for consent in research.
Nicholson R
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Dec-2004 Jan; (194):13-21. PubMed ID: 15832471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mengele's birthmark: the Nuremberg Code in United States courts.
Annas GJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():17-45. PubMed ID: 11645690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity.
Capron AM
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1430-4. PubMed ID: 10228198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Influence of the Nuremberg physicians' trials--beginning a new era in the ethical judging of human experiments].
Kerpel-Fronius S
Orv Hetil; 2008 Feb; 149(5):195-201. PubMed ID: 18218586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity--executive summary.
US National Bioethics Advisory Commission
J Int Bioethique; 2002 Mar; 13(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15038373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Proposed regulations for research involving those institutionalized as mentally infirm: a consideration of their relevance in 1995.
Levine RJ
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):177-86. PubMed ID: 11654513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct and unethical human experimentation: historic parallels and moral implications.
Lefor AT
Nutrition; 2005; 21(7-8):878-82. PubMed ID: 15975498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accountability in research using persons with mental illness.
Shamoo AE; Irving DN
Account Res; 1993; 3(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 11659726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal.
Katz J
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1662-6. PubMed ID: 8922453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vulnerable persons in biomedical research: 50 years after the Nuremberg Code.
Dickens BM
J Int Bioethique; 1999; 10(1-2):13-23. PubMed ID: 11806429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. kaimowitz v. Department of Mental Health: a right to be free from experimental psychosurgery?
Mason JR
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):301-39. PubMed ID: 11661088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Constitutional law--an involuntarily detained mental patient's informed consent is invalid for experimental psychosurgery.
Fabri CJ
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1974; 50(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 11664306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
