222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16317858)
1. What do researchers say? What do subjects hear? Not what they would like to hear. What do subjects need? More information.
McMillan G
Prot Hum Subj; 2005; (12):10-1. PubMed ID: 16317858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Parents' perspectives on having their children interviewed for research.
Hadley EK; Smith CA; Gallo AM; Angst DB; Knafl KA
Res Nurs Health; 2008 Feb; 31(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 18163390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent: views from Karachi.
Jafarey A
East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S50-5. PubMed ID: 17037689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients".
McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7. PubMed ID: 21534136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Trust, understanding and utopia in the research setting.
Justo L
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):56-8; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rethinking adolescent assent: a triangular approach.
Trivedi AD
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):75-6. PubMed ID: 16179324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the ethics of ethics research: a case study.
Miller FG; Wendler D
IRB; 2004; 26(2):9-12. PubMed ID: 15069971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The role and responsibilities of witnesses in the informed consent process.
Angeles-Llerenas AR; Wirtz V; Lara-Alvarez CF
Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18370932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to withdraw from research.
Schaefer GO; Wertheimer A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2010 Dec; 20(4):329-52. PubMed ID: 21338028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vulnerability to influence: a two-way street.
Henderson GE; Davis AM; King NM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):50-2; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Consenting to research is more than a contractual agreement-it is a personal commitment.
Hinds PS
Cancer Nurs; 2009; 32(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 19411934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Research subject advocates: to whom are they loyal?
Bramstedt KA
Clin Invest Med; 2003 Apr; 26(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 12722838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In the face of death: four ethical issues.
Ozar DT
Perspectives Prof; 2000; 20(1):E6. PubMed ID: 15115043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The moral primacy of the human being.
Parker C
J Med Ethics; 2010 Sep; 36(9):563-6. PubMed ID: 20693483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The unique ethical challenges of conducting research in the rehabilitation medicine population.
Blackmer J
BMC Med Ethics; 2003 Jun; 4():E2. PubMed ID: 12812526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "You may have already won..": an examination of the use of lottery payments in research.
Brown JS; Schonfeld TL; Gordon BG
IRB; 2006; 28(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16680874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors.
Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Grisso T
IRB; 2004; 26(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 15069970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The many ways of saying yes and no: reflections on the research coordinator's role in recruiting research participants and obtaining informed consent.
Huntington I; Robinson W
IRB; 2007; 29(3):6-10. PubMed ID: 17847636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cancer research and therapy: a view from Norway.
Ruyter KW
Perspectives Prof; 2000; 20(1):E5. PubMed ID: 15115042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
